请教大全2-14

nymphl · 发表于 2010-4-5 07:05:41

大全-2-14. A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole Countyfound that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. Thisindicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers cangreatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an autoaccident.
Theconclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?
(A) Of all the drivers andfront-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seatbelts at the time of their accidents.
(B) Considerably more than 20percent of drivers and front-seat passengers in Dole County always wear seatbelts when traveling by car.
(C) More drivers and front-seatpassengers in the survey than rear-seat passengers were very severely injured.
(D) More than half of the driversand front-seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the timeof their accidents.（A）
(E) Most of the auto accidentsreported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.
A这个答案也太简单了吧？

nymphl · 发表于 2010-4-5 07:07:56

A的答案是顺从什么思路啊？是什么逻辑关系呢？

TeamCancer · 发表于 2010-4-5 14:08:29

这个能找到原题出处么？答案靠谱么？

我觉得是B，比A强很多
如果没有B，A可以模糊算

719870465 · 发表于 2011-3-7 13:57:13

	带头盔	不带头盔	总计
受伤	0.2B	0.8B	B
不受伤			T-B
总计	A	T-A	T

题意是证明"戴头盔的受伤率"低于"不戴头盔的受伤率"，即有如下不等式：
0.2B/A<0.8B/(T-A)

得出A>0.2T，即戴头盔的人数要大于总人数的20%.

我爱SAAB · 发表于 2011-3-7 16:14:53

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-524525-1-1.html

我有在这里问。。。

上面的不等式很赞啊，要的就是这样明确的解释！！！

ILLYAwang · 发表于 2015-6-24 20:16:00

原来如此，这要是考试考到这题绝对死了。。。。谢谢解答

请教大全2-14

类似于数学中的列标题

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()