ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2296|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助CR一题!Many researchers believe that...

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-29 18:30:00 | 只看该作者

求助CR一题!Many researchers believe that...

Many researchers believe that the presence of RNA in brain cells is the biochemical basis of memory; that is , the presence of RNA enables us to remember. Because certain chemicals are known to inhibit the synthesis of RNA in the body, we can test this hypothesis. Animals that have learned particular responses can be injected with an RNA inhibitor and then tested for memory of the learned responses.

which of the following test results would most seriously weaken the case for RNA as the basis of memory?

a.  after an injection of RNA inhibitor, a wide range of behaviors in addition to the learned responses were affected.

b. After an injection of RNA inhibitor, animals that had not consistently been giving the learned responses were able to give them consistently.

c. after injections of RNA inhibitor, some animals lost memory of the learned responses totally but others lost it only partially.

d. after a small injection of RNA inhibitor, animals responded well, but as the size of the inhection increased, they gave fewer of the learned responses.

e. after an injection of RNA inhibitor, animals could not learn a new response.

沙发
发表于 2008-5-29 21:47:00 | 只看该作者

C吧。

不论丧失的多少,总归是丧失了,所以削弱了论点。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-29 22:14:00 | 只看该作者
答案是B,很诧异,难道消除RNA把那些没学会反映的动物脑子里的“笨笨”细胞擦掉了??
地板
发表于 2008-5-29 23:56:00 | 只看该作者

答案应该是B  没啥不对啊   注射之后, 本来记得不连贯现在变得连贯,削弱原文结论

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-30 13:08:00 | 只看该作者
哦 对的, 选项看到后来就去寻找支持选项了
6#
发表于 2008-5-30 16:13:00 | 只看该作者

考点:削弱因果关系

原文观点认为:“RNA”是因,“能记住”是果

正确答案为B,削弱方式为无因有果(注意,C的描述是RNA受到障碍的情况下,动物的记忆反而更好了)


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-30 16:13:33编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-30 02:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部