ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7660|回复: 26
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[注意]中欧的实际薪水约=FT排名薪水/4,因为考虑到购买力等因素。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-24 17:36:00 | 只看该作者

[注意]中欧的实际薪水约=FT排名薪水/4,因为考虑到购买力等因素。

不好意思,来灌点凉水。
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-24 20:49:32编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-1-24 17:39:00 | 只看该作者

应该是这个数吧。

板凳
发表于 2005-1-25 13:32:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sv2000在2005-1-24 17:36:00的发言:
不好意思,来灌点凉水。


in this case, the ranking should be divided by 4? then equal to No.5
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-25 14:00:00 | 只看该作者

To CEIBS_MBA2005

兄弟讲话可真幽默!不过我讲得可是真正的内幕实事啊。不过也是公开的。

5#
发表于 2005-1-25 17:49:00 | 只看该作者

因该不会。我们的毕业生现在都有25万左右。3年前的学生的平均工资应该

比才毕业的人高把。

6#
发表于 2005-1-25 17:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sv2000在2005-1-25 14:00:00的发言:

To CEIBS_MBA2005


兄弟讲话可真幽默!不过我讲得可是真正的内幕实事啊。不过也是公开的。



Then how do you guarantee that other oversea business schools listed in the top level have nothing to be hidden? Have nothing to be withdrawn from public attention? what you referred to was not that CEIBS submitted its application docutments to the committee different from the committee whom the other oversea BS's submitted the exact same stuffs to? If not, all right, considering that both CEIBS and other oversea BS's had the same committee, what the hell made you guys think that the committee showed the preference for CEIBS?

7#
发表于 2005-1-25 20:47:00 | 只看该作者

PPP (RMB : International Dollar) = 4.565:1


Source: World Bank Website


Based on FT data, annual package is around RMB 447K. It seems reasonable.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-25 20:47:53编辑过]
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-26 02:07:00 | 只看该作者

To 山水郎

你说得很对,就是PPP!

希望没有冒犯CEIBS_MBA2005及其Ceibs的拥护者,当然我承认CEIBS是一流的商学院。

9#
发表于 2005-1-26 08:10:00 | 只看该作者

引用"Then how do you guarantee that other oversea business schools listed in the top level have nothing to be hidden? Have nothing to be withdrawn from public attention? what you referred to was not that CEIBS submitted its application docutments to the committee different from the committee whom the other oversea BS's submitted the exact same stuffs to? If not, all right, considering that both CEIBS and other oversea BS's had the same committee, what the hell made you guys think that the committee showed the preference for CEIBS?

真有可能是不同的评委呕

10#
发表于 2005-1-26 08:11:00 | 只看该作者
怎么才能象那样引用啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:


近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-24 14:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部