攒RP 想通两道prep逻辑题献给大家

gazux · 发表于 2010-4-27 06:34:09

87. (31284-!-item-!-188;#058&005747)

Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 percent the government-provided pensions paid to Runagians over 65. The aim of the increase was to stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country, where most pension recipients live. Statistics, however, show that there has been no increase in economic activity in those regions since then, but that there has been noticeably more spending in the urban areas.两年前，政府提高了20%的养老金为了促进经济发展。然而数据表明，这些地区的经济活动并没有明显的上升而在城市中的花销却显著提高了。
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase resulted in the unintended state of affairs described?

A. Until the pensions were increased, many Runagians over 65 in rural regions had been receiving support from their children who live in urban areas. 老人先前有子女支持所以花销也不错，后来有政府的养老金，这样就不用和子女要钱了，但是老人的经济活动不变。而这样子女的钱就多起来了，这样就解释了城市的花销却多了起来。
B. The pensions were increased when the number of people below the poverty level in rural areas of Runagia reached an all-time high.
C. City-dwellers in Runagia rarely travel to rural regions of the country.
D. The Runagian postal system is so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks for pension checks to reach recipients in rural areas.
E. On average, the pensions were higher in rural than in urban areas before

107.(26093-!-item-!-188;#058&001880)(GWD 1-Q40 different type)

Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available.They have been used primarily by older adults, who are at risk for complications from influenza.A new vaccine administered in a nasal spray has proven effective in preventing influenza in children.Since children are significantly more likely than adults to contract and spread influenza, making the new vaccine widely available for children will greatly reduce the spread of influenza across the population.

防止流行感冒的只有可注射的疫苗，主要用于成人。新型疫苗是鼻子的喷雾式的，针对小孩防止流行性感冒很有疗效。因为小孩比大人更容易感染和传染流行性感冒，因此，广泛使用新型疫苗将减少了流行感冒的传播。

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. If a person receives both the injectable and the nasal-spray vaccine, the two vaccines do not interfere with each other. 无关

B. The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as injectable vaccines do.无关

C. Government subsidies have kept the injectable vaccine affordable for all older adults. 无关

D. Of the older adults who contract influenza, relatively few contract it from children with influenza.父母得了流行性感冒，很少是来自患流行性感冒的小孩。Weaken。

E. Many parents would be more inclined to have their children vaccinated against influenza if the vaccination did not require an injection.

很多父母更倾向于让小孩打不注射的疫苗。这样就和文中的结论一致了

gracezz · 发表于 2010-4-27 09:22:01

这个和OG12的一个题好像，但是问法和选项变了吧？

谢谢楼主~~~：）

梦想守护者 · 发表于 2010-4-27 11:22:11

和GWD上一道题也很类似呢，刚才还困惑着呢，这回明白了，谢谢LZ！！！！

gazux · 发表于 2010-4-28 06:37:07

caoqin1981 · 发表于 2011-10-6 10:13:40

TTGWD-14-40 方便大家参考
Q40:
Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available.

arents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A.   Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.
B.   The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do.
C.   The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.
D.   Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.
E.   The nasal spray vaccine is mot effective when administered to adults.
Answer: D

bonfin · 发表于 2011-10-22 16:27:18

rongnai · 发表于 2012-9-17 16:03:20

谢谢想明白这道题了

vivianpdn · 发表于 2014-3-29 22:55:51

http://forum.chasedream.com/foru ... &fromuid=967098 楼主，可不可以再多问一句，这道题D项是咋回事呀？原文前提是：小孩子很少患上流感带来的并发症；结论是：用鼻喷雾型疫苗并不能显著的有助于公共卫生，那D项“成人的流感的并发症并非是被孩子传染的”是怎么weaken结论的？

vivianpdn · 发表于 2014-3-29 22:57:39

TTGWD-14-40 方便大家参考
Q40:
Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. arents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.
B. The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do.
C. The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.
D. Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.
E. The nasal spray vaccine is mot effective when administered to adults.
Answer: D

这是题目

taylorchina · 发表于 2014-12-6 21:15:03

vivianpdn 发表于 2014-3-29 22:57
这是题目

argument的conclusion是既然孩子很少得并发症，那么公共卫生不会从给孩子广泛用喷射型疫苗获益。

D取非后conclusion被削弱。取非：成人主要从得病的孩子身上感染流感。削弱了“公共卫生不会从给孩子广泛用喷射型疫苗获益。”

攒RP 想通两道prep逻辑题献给大家

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

攒RP 想通两道prep逻辑题 献给大家

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

攒RP 想通两道prep逻辑题献给大家