1.        GWD-2-Q14:

Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

1. Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.

2. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.

3. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.

4. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.

5. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

我做的是CR分类版，所以题号有些对不起来，查了版上这个题号的帖子讨论的是生产电视机那道，所以只好发个新贴来问，多谢各位解答了。给出的答案是A, 但不是很明白A怎样割断80%和效率高的联系。

题目有说80%并不是一个good job
            

因为那些捐款都是以前捐过的那些人捐的
                 没有积极去开发donor base

所以选A

希望你帮到忙

是选C么？

答案是A呢

B,D,E都很好排除，但是C,我现在想想可能是因为说的只是过去捐赠过的人捐的这些是他们自己捐的而不是募捐人去联系来的，但没有说过去捐赠人所捐是不是占大部分

但是A貌似支持也很牵强，Smithtown Uni的募捐人联系从前没捐过的潜在捐款人和其他学校募捐人联系的一样，这个就是support么？原文哪里可以看出其他学校募捐人没有do a good job呢？联系不起来啊，还望哪位高手再来解答下呢。谢谢啦！

我找到了之前老题号的讨论

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&replyid=639542&id=57558&page=1&skin=0&Star=3

见第三页LAWYER_1的解释，原文的结论是不能说明做得好，和做得不好是两回事情，A说和别的学校做得一样正说明没有做得特别好的地方，正好证明了80%这个EXCEPTIONALLY HIGH RATE不能说明THEY WERE DOING A GOOD JOB.