求解释prep08逻辑笔记一道类比推理的解释：providing carts would not increase Jerrod’s profits

SkylarX · 发表于 2014-10-9 00:05:41

76. Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

According to experts on shopping behavior, more shoppers would shop at Jerrod’s department store if they were offered the convenience of shopping carts. In fact, even if the amount spent by these additional customers only just covered the cost of providing the carts, providing carts would still probably increase Jerrod’s profits, since _______.

A. the layout of Jerrod’s is open enough to accommodate shopping carts comfortably
B. several department stores that compete with Jerrod’s have begun to make shopping carts available to their customers
C. there are some potential customers who would not be enticed to shop at Jerrod’s by the availability of shopping carts
D. stores that make shopping carts available to customers usually have to hire people to retrieve them from parking areas
E. a customer with a shopping cart buys more, on average, than a customer without a cart

找到前提和结论：
这是一道解释题，一般来说这种题目的结论都是和前提相反的。也就是说，前提的内容在逻
辑上理应能推出一个结论，而论证中在给出一个转折词（诸如however）后，提出一个相反
的结论。然后让我们解释这个“surprising result”。所以本题中本应该有的结论是“providing
carts would not increase Jerrod’s profits”。其实本题问的就是削弱这种推理。

结论应该是最后一句
“就算 the amount spent by these additional customers 只是刚刚平了 the cost of providing the carts，提供购物车也能转账J的利润”
这个理解应该没错啊
但为什么后面解释给的就成了
“所以本题中本应该有的结论是“providing carts would not increase Jerrod’s profits”。其实本题问的就是削弱这种推理”？？？？？

是为了简化这种理解，还是题目就就就就是这个意思？？？？我理解错了？？？

SkylarX · 发表于 2014-10-9 00:58:17

已.....想通

[Helr题库] 求解释prep08逻辑笔记一道类比推理的解释：providing carts would not increase Jerrod’s profits

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()