ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4843|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求大牛解答OG13 CR 104

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-7-21 22:35:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
原题:Theater Critic: The play La Finestrina, now at Central Theater, was written in Italy in the eighteenth century. The
director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater.
Although the actorwho plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent ofthe twentieth-century
American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had
begun in sixteenth-century Italy.
The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
(A) modern audiences would find it hard to tolerate certain characteristics of a historically accurate
performance of an eighteenth-century play
(B) Groucho Marx once performed the part of the character Harlequin in La Finestrina
(C) in the United States the training of actors in the twentieth century is based on principles that do not differ
radically from those that underlay the training of actors in eighteenth-century Italy
(D) the performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the
director's claim
(E) the director of La Finestrina must have advised the actor who plays Harlequin to model his performance on comic performances of Groucho Marx Argument


E的解释是 That the performance remindedthe theater critic of Groucho Marx hardly shows that the similarity was intentional, let alone that it was at the director's instruction

实在看不懂E的解释在解释什么。。。求指点求点拨!!
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
发表于 2013-7-22 10:07:29 | 只看该作者
同问,我感觉大致是说:不是director 主动指导actor模仿GM那种风格的表演

另外:我想问LZ和其他NN:The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that 这个题目到底什么意思?consideration是啥? argument that后面应该接啥?到底都是啥意思啊,我不懂
板凳
发表于 2013-7-22 17:19:07 | 只看该作者
顶,继续问
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-7-22 18:44:52 | 只看该作者
wellsli 发表于 2013-7-22 10:07
同问,我感觉大致是说:不是director 主动指导actor模仿GM那种风格的表演

另外:我想问LZ和其他NN:The co ...

The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that 是问上述给的材料可以作为以下5个结论中哪个的support

然后这道题解决了:是因为就算actor的风格跟GM很像也并没有提供证据证明这个相像是可以的,更不用说是导演建议演员去相像的~
5#
发表于 2013-7-22 20:47:28 | 只看该作者
我觉得E的意思是说“这个导演肯定提出了建议让表演Harlequin的演员去模仿Groucho Marx 的表演。” E的解释是:这个表演让评论员想到了Groucho Marx 的表演并不能说明这种类似是蓄意的,更不能说明是在导演的指导下(完成这种模仿表演的)。就是说:这种和Groucho Marx 表演的类似和导演没关系,是评论员自己想出来的。所以E不对。
这道题是问以上信息支持下面那个结论。
6#
发表于 2013-9-11 23:00:29 | 只看该作者
原来这是道归纳题,看看老外的分析,我也是截取来的,希望对后面有问题的CDer有帮助。

Step one of the Kaplan method tells us to read the question stem, and then to determine the kind of question that it is. The question stem:

“The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that”

Okay, so there are considerations given (by the author) leading up to an argument. The “considerations given” is evidence, and the question wants us to determine the author’s main point, or conclusion. We call this type of question a “main point” question.

Step two is to analyze the stimulus: Normally, we identify a conclusion by looking for words like “thus, therefore, hence, etc.” .... BUT, in a main point question, we actually don’t want to be attracted by those kind of words-they are put there by the test-maker because they know you will naturally be attracted to them in a main point question.

Instead, in a main point question, the author’s main point will often be signalled by a contrast keyword such as “but,” “however,” “while,” or, “although.”

In the passage of this question, we learn of the director’s claim in the second sentence. The director’s claim is that their reproduction of the play is a lot like the original play. The next sentence starts with the word “although.” Here, the function of “although” is to dismiss potential counter-evidence against the director’s claim: the fact that the actor is like 20th century Groucho Marx could be used against the director’s claim (that the reproduction is a faithful representation of the original 16th century version.)

So from the word “although,” and using some critical reasoning, we can determine that the author’s intent in arguing is to defend the director’s claim against evidence that could go against it (against the director’s claim).

Step three of the method is to make a prediction of the right answer. Say to yourself: “The author is defending the director. The author’s main point is that the director’s claim is correct.”

Step four is to aggressively scan for a match to the prediction. Because we spent so much time generating the prediction, and because we don’t care about wrong answers and why they are wrong, we scan for a choice that matches our insight.

Then, choice D is correct.
7#
发表于 2013-9-26 17:25:35 | 只看该作者
受教了!
8#
发表于 2014-2-19 20:13:51 | 只看该作者
WindyMM 发表于 2013-9-11 23:00
原来这是道归纳题,看看老外的分析,我也是截取来的,希望对后面有问题的CDer有帮助。

Step one of the Ka ...

这个分析厉害
9#
发表于 2014-7-8 17:49:09 | 只看该作者
WindyMM 发表于 2013-9-11 23:00
原来这是道归纳题,看看老外的分析,我也是截取来的,希望对后面有问题的CDer有帮助。

Step one of the Ka ...

太赞!醍醐灌顶的感觉
10#
发表于 2014-7-25 18:29:37 | 只看该作者
WindyMM 发表于 2013-9-11 23:00
原来这是道归纳题,看看老外的分析,我也是截取来的,希望对后面有问题的CDer有帮助。

Step one of the Ka ...

太厉害了!恍然大悟
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-13 21:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部