GWD3-Q17: Brochure: Helpconserve our city’s water supply. Byconverting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, youcan greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it alsosaves you money. Criticism: For mostpeople with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscapecannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversionwould save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills. Which of the following, if true, provides the best basisfor a rebuttal of the criticism? A. Evenhomeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conservewater by installing water-saving devices in their homes. B. Aconventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure onfertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape. C. Asignificant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that donot have yards. D. Itcosts no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put inconventional landscaping. E. Somehomeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposescombined.
这个题答案选B,可是B和D有区别吗。有人能帮忙翻译一下区别吗?谢谢大家了。
|