Cross-Placements Of Top Schools，分享一点有意思的东西

mgong93 · 发表于 2014-3-16 04:57:56

http://research.ivo-welch.info/phdnetworks.html

ivo Wech用截止到2010年的数据做的，非常interesting，比如Chicago和Stanford从来没有互相place过自己的学生。UIUC可能被高估了，因为除了place给自己但是没有place到其他学校。。。

基本结论是：
”I will loosely refer to Chicago, MIT, Harvard, and Stanford as the top-4 schools here. This is because they have produced more than twice the number of graduates as the next programs (Penn and UCLA). I will refer to Chicago, MIT, Harvard, Stanford, Penn, UCLA, Columbia, Yale, Berkeley and Princeton as the top-10 schools. These pseudo-ranks are of course wildly misleading. If any of this language upsets you, please consider that neither the author nor the author's own school show up in the top-20 list.

The table is best thought of as overall average measure of the quality of PhD programs, the quality of PhD graduates, and the quality of long-term placement. It may help students decide among different programs. (The tables also give a partial picture of professional networks; however a better measure would include overlapping collegue-ships.)“

tiandirukia · 发表于 2014-3-16 07:35:24

Wech 不是在UCLA么。。

mgong93 · 发表于 2014-3-16 23:36:40

tiandirukia 发表于 2014-3-16 07:35
Wech 不是在UCLA么。。

I think that's partly why he refers to Chicago as the best, and UCLA as the 6th best program.

sccdxwj · 发表于 2014-3-17 00:25:26

好像数据不是很全，我知道的好多人名都不在上面

Cross-Placements Of Top Schools，分享一点有意思的东西

所属分类: 商学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块