Q5 to Q7:
According to a theory advanced
by researcher Paul Martin, the wave
of species extinctions that occurred
Line in North America about 11,000 years
(5) ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,
can be directly attributed to the arrival
of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who
were ancestors of modern Native
Americans. However, anthropologist
(10) Shepard Krech points out that large
animal species vanished even in areas
where there is no evidence to demon-
strate that Paleoindians hunted them.
Nor were extinctions confined to large
(15) animals: small animals, plants, and
insects disappeared, presumably not
all through human consumption. Krech
also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of
climatic change as an explanation by
(20) asserting that widespread climatic
change did indeed occur at the end of
the Pleistocene. Still, Krech attributes
secondary if not primary responsibility
for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,
(25) arguing that humans have produced
local extinctions elsewhere. But,
according to historian Richard White,
even the attribution of secondary
responsibility may not be supported
(30) by the evidence. White observes that
Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding
dates for the arrival of humans and the
decline of large animal species, and
Krech, though aware that the dates
(35) are controversial, does not challenge
them; yet recent archaeological
discoveries are providing evidence
that the date of human arrival was
much earlier than 11,000 years ago.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q7:
In the last sentence of the passage, the author refers to “recent archaeological discoveries” (lines 36-37) most probably in order to
- refute White’s suggestion that neither Maritn nor Krech adequately account for Paleoindians’ contributions to the Pleistocene extinctions
- cast doubt on the possibility that a more definitive theory regarding the causes of the Pleistocene extinctions may be forthcoming
- suggest that Martin’s, Krech’s, and White’s theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions are all open to question
- call attention to the most controversial aspect of all the current theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions
- provide support for White’s questioning of both Martin’s and Krech’s positions regarding the role of Paleoindians in the Pleistocene extinctions
according to historian Richard White,
even the attribution of secondary
responsibility may not be supported
(30) by the evidence.
我理解这段话的意思是不是说:w认为即使认为那些古代人在生物灭绝中期的作用第二重要的观点也是没有根据的。
言下之意是说人类在物种灭绝中期的作用是微不足道的。
而后来发现的证据却发现人类比原来推测的时间要早很多来到那里,也就是又可能队伍中的灭绝又责任,这个观点与w的正好是反的。
答案为什么是e呢? |