ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3903|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd6-5-7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-29 22:15:00 | 只看该作者

gwd6-5-7

Q5 to Q7:


      According to a theory advanced


       by researcher Paul Martin, the wave


       of species extinctions that occurred


Line       in North America about 11,000 years


  (5)       ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,


can be directly attributed to the arrival


of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who


were ancestors of modern Native


Americans.  However, anthropologist


(10)      Shepard Krech points out that large


animal species vanished even in areas


where there is no evidence to demon-


strate that Paleoindians hunted them.


Nor were extinctions confined to large


(15)      animals:  small animals, plants, and


insects disappeared, presumably not


all through human consumption.  Krech


also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of


climatic change as an explanation by


(20)      asserting that widespread climatic


       change did indeed occur at the end of


       the Pleistocene.  Still, Krech attributes


secondary if not primary responsibility


for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,


(25)      arguing that humans have produced


local extinctions elsewhere.  But,


according to historian Richard White,


even the attribution of secondary


responsibility may not be supported


(30)      by the evidence.  White observes that


Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding


dates for the arrival of humans and the


       decline of large animal species, and


Krech, though aware that the dates


(35)      are controversial, does not challenge


them; yet recent archaeological


discoveries are providing evidence


that the date of human arrival was


much earlier than 11,000 years ago.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q7:


In the last sentence of the passage, the author refers to “recent archaeological discoveries” (lines 36-37) most probably in order to




  • refute White’s suggestion that neither Maritn nor Krech adequately account for Paleoindians’ contributions to the Pleistocene extinctions

  • cast doubt on the possibility that a more definitive theory regarding the causes of the Pleistocene extinctions may be forthcoming

  • suggest that Martin’s, Krech’s, and White’s theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions are all open to question

  • call attention to the most controversial aspect of all the current theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions

  • provide support for White’s questioning of both Martin’s and Krech’s positions regarding the role of Paleoindians in the Pleistocene extinctions

  •               according to historian Richard White,


    even the attribution of secondary


    responsibility may not be supported


    (30)      by the evidence.  


    我理解这段话的意思是不是说:w认为即使认为那些古代人在生物灭绝中期的作用第二重要的观点也是没有根据的。


    言下之意是说人类在物种灭绝中期的作用是微不足道的。



    而后来发现的证据却发现人类比原来推测的时间要早很多来到那里,也就是又可能队伍中的灭绝又责任,这个观点与w的正好是反的。


    答案为什么是e呢?

    沙发
    发表于 2004-10-1 06:48:00 | 只看该作者
    早得多就不是人类影响得了, 要影响就早影响了
    板凳
     楼主| 发表于 2004-10-1 12:21:00 | 只看该作者
    一语惊醒梦中人哪
    地板
    发表于 2005-1-19 06:08:00 | 只看该作者

    the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago.

    中的the wave of species extinctions 什么意思呀,这个wave没见过. 金山词霸查了, 朗文下载安装有问题,郁闷.

    5#
    发表于 2005-1-19 10:06:00 | 只看该作者

    According to LDOCE,

    wave:

    3
    EOPLE AND THINGS◀
    [countable] a sudden increase in the number of people or things arriving at the same time
    wave of
    a new wave of immigrants They faced wave after wave of fresh troops.

    6#
    发表于 2005-1-20 11:32:00 | 只看该作者
    多谢
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-14 03:47
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部