有题不会求大神帮助，能否详细解答解题思路

chelsie_guo · 发表于 2014-2-27 21:04:52

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator

wyw1018 · 发表于 2014-3-3 17:16:42

去搜搜吧

wyw1018 · 发表于 2014-3-3 21:30:22

我怎么觉得答案是B

wyw1018 · 发表于 2014-3-4 21:29:31

虽然以前的答案都是给的C，但是我还是认为B是正确答案。

[逻辑小分队] 有题不会求大神帮助，能否详细解答解题思路

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()