- UID
- 791810
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-8-9
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.
Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?
(A) The many fatal strokes and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.
(B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.
(C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.
(D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly .
(E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.
答案A 对A的理解是 治疗高血压的费用微不足道 但是这样微不足道可以省去假如患了中风和心脏病这些重病而造成的治疗所花费的重金 这意思对么?如果是这样 cause 的主语不是 “many 致命的中风和心脏病发作么 the many xxx 引起了无关紧要的费用 但是XXXX” 根本特么逻辑上想不明白 还是我理解错了? 后面other sort 啥意思 ?
常年CD无人帮忙 真伤心 没人帮 以后再尼玛也不上了 !!! |
|