ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1476|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-8-4-10

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-2 04:34:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-8-4-10

10.   Almost all of the books published in the past 150 years were printed on acidic paper. Unfortunately, every kind of acidic paper gradually destroys itself due to its very acidity. This process of deterioration can be slowed if the books are stored in a cool, dry environment. Techniques, which are now being developed, to deacidify books will probably be applied only to books with historical significance.


If all of the statements in the passage above are true, which one of the following must also be true?


(A) If a book was published in the past 150 years and is historically insignificant, it will probably deteriorate completely.


(B) Almost all of the books published in the past 150 years will gradually destroy themselves.


(C) Almost all of the books that gradually deteriorate are made of acidic paper.


(D) If a book is of historical significance and was printed before 150 years ago, it will be deacidified.A


(E) Books published on acidic paper in 1900 should now all be at about the same state of deterioration.



前人讨论过,但还是觉得B也可以解释的通的。


A:“and is historically insignificant ”,好像根本是多余的。 是不是只根据If a book was published in the past 150 years 就可以判断出it will probably deteriorate completely?


但是文章只提到“gradually destroys itself due to its very acidity”并没有提到会destroy completely,



B 错在哪里呢?


沙发
发表于 2005-1-3 06:46:00 | 只看该作者

"and is historically insignificant" in A is a second necessary condition for the conclusion "it will probably deteriorate completely" to stand.  If a book is historically significant, it could be protected by the deacidifying technique, and thus won't deteriorate.

B is wrong because the deacidifying technique could protect books from destroy themselves.

Because of the strong meaning of "destroy", the end result of "gradually destorying itself" is "complete destroying".

板凳
发表于 2005-1-4 11:52:00 | 只看该作者
B is wrong because the deacidifying technique could protect books with historical significance from destroy themselves. so"Almost all of the books" is wrong.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-7 02:03:00 | 只看该作者

啊呀,又看错了。 insignificant 看成了significant.太不仔细了!!

谢了楼上二位!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 23:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部