- UID
- 791810
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-8-9
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Editorial: This year, the Marionville school board received five textbook proposals submitted by local book publishers. In each instance, the school rejected the proposal on the grounds that the curriculum covered within the textbooks was inadequate, controversial or, surprisingly, too comprehensive. Consequently, because the school board must accept at least one textbook proposal in order to have materials for this upcoming years, the school board has acted negligently in failing to accept at least one of the proposals.
The answer to which one of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the truth of the conclusion in the editorial?
(A) How many of the proposals that were rejected by the school board were rejected on the basis that the curriculum was too comprehensive?
(B) What was the opinion of the parents' association regarding the five textbook proposals?
(C) Did any non-local textbook publishers submit a textbook proposal to the Marionville school board?
(D) Could the schoool board have accepted multiple proposals that would have, in combination, have provided the approopriate materials?
(E) In previous years, has the Marionville school board rejected all the textbook proposals submitted by book publishers?
希望路过大NN 帮忙解释下 最好能详细点 谢谢谢谢！！！！实在找不到。
希望CD的大N们还能如以前一样乐于助人！！！
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2013-8-4 22:34:08
收藏
收藏
