ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Advertisement: Ten years ago, the Cormond Hotel's lobby was carpeted with Duratex carpet while the lobby of a nearby hotel was being carpeted with our competitor's most durable carpet. Today, after a decade in which the two hotels have had similar amounts of foot traffic through their lobbies, that other hotel is having to replace the worn-out carpeting near its lobby entrances, whereas the Cormond's Duratex carpeting has years of wear left in it.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the advertisement's evidence for concluding that Duratex carpet is more durable than the carpet of its competitor?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2733|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[Helr题库] 虚心请教PREP08的73题,Helr的方法我用的有点儿混乱了。先谢谢大家。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-11-11 06:04:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Advertisement: Ten years ago, the Cormond Hotel's lobby was carpeted with Duratexcarpet while the lobby of a nearby hotel was being carpeted with ourcompetitor's most durable carpet.  Today,after a decade in which the two hotels have had similar amounts of foot trafficthrough their lobbies, that other hotel is having to replace the worn-outcarpeting near its lobby entrances, whereas the Cormond's Duratex carpeting hasyears of wear left in it.
Which of the following, if true, most seriouslyweakens the force of the advertisement's evidence for concluding that Duratexcarpet is more durable than the carpet of its competitor?
A. The lobby of the Cormond Hotel has fivedifferent entrances, but the lobby of the other hotel has only two.
B. The carpet of the Cormond Hotel's lobby is notthe most durable carpet that Duratex manufactures.
C. The other hotel has a popular restaurant thatcan be reached from outside without walking through the hotel lobby.
D. The carpet that is being used to replacecarpeting near the other hotel's lobby entrances is not Duratex carpet.
E. There is a third hotel near the other two thathas not replaced the Duratex carpet in its lobby for more than 15 years.


我是这么做的,不知道对不对。

1. 结论在问题里,说D的地毯好。就是说C宾馆的地毯没有坏。

2. 这是helr老师提过的“类比”的推理模式,那么:

C宾馆和other宾馆,相似的地点,经历了相同的时间,相同了客流;other宾馆的地毯坏了-->C宾馆的地毯也应该坏了

3.问题是削弱“C宾馆的地毯没有坏”这个结论。

那不就是应该加强“C宾馆的地毯坏了”这个结论吗?可是看helr老师的笔记,说削弱这个类比推理,不就是相当于削弱了C宾馆的地毯也应该坏了吗?

这是不是矛盾了?还是我理解的哪里有问题?

希望大家指点一下!

谢谢了先!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-11-11 06:37:21 | 只看该作者
顶上去,希望有人能解答一下
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-11-11 09:53:36 | 只看该作者
顶上去,希望有人能解答一下
地板
发表于 2013-11-14 00:37:50 | 只看该作者
选a,别人整理的helr我看过两遍,但是应该是悟性不够,没办法完全领会他的精髓,楼主可以尝试自己总结
这题是用对比的方法推出结论,要weaken的话直接说不具有可比性就好了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 06:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部