求帮忙翻译

ISU的约翰 · 发表于 2019-11-24 09:18:39

Social historian Mary Ryan, for example, has argued that in early nineteenth-century America the identical legal status of working-class and middle-class free women outweighed the differences between women of these two classes: married women, regardless of their family's wealth, did essentially the same unpaid domestic work, and none could own property or vote.

来自开头为：
Traditional social science models of class groups in the United States are based on economic status and assume that women's economic status derives from association with men, typically fathers or husbands, and that 。。。。这个文章

spicytaco · 发表于 2019-12-14 14:28:44

Social historian Mary Ryan, for example, has argued that (in early nineteenth-century America) _the identical legal status of _ working-class and middle-class free women <outweighed> the differences between women of these two classes: ( identical status ) married women, regardless of their family's wealth, did essentially the same unpaid domestic work, and none could own property or vote.

750嫁给我吧 · 发表于 2019-12-14 14:57:58

Social historian Mary Ryan, for example, has argued that in early nineteenth-century America the identical legal status of working-class and middle-class free women outweighed the differences between women of these two classes: married women, regardless of their family's wealth, did essentially the same unpaid and none could own property or vote.
例如，社会历史学家mm就争议道： 19世纪美国的中产，工人阶级的自由女性的相同的权利地位盖过了两个阶级的区别： (这里解释咋一样）已婚女性，无关财富，干基本上一样的无偿家务活，并且不可拥有财产或投票

求帮忙翻译

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块