xdf逻辑分册里的一题

cyvivi · 发表于 2013-5-13 16:08:51

不知道出自哪里，知道的同学告知一下，我把标题改了 3Q

Normally, experts enter their field with the goal of doing important new investigation and accept as their colleaques thoswith similar motivation. Thus, when any expert wins renown as expounder of science to general audiences, most other experts conclude that this popularize should noo longer be regarded as a real colleague.

The explanation offered aobe for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held byh research experts assumes that

A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activiy, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaques
B) research experts tend not to regard as coleagues those experts whose renown they envy
c) a scientist can become a famous popularizer withoout having completed any important research
d) research experts believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
e) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves expert

我的问题在于不是很理解这题的逻辑关系，可能自己太主观了。
我用排除法身下B和D，但我觉得可能是B

请各位朋友帮忙解答一下这题的逻辑关系

不甚感激啊

ldv · 发表于 2013-5-22 17:11:46

这道题我开始也做错了。。不过后来思考了一下发现自己一开始其实没有太读懂题。这题目是：
P1：通常说，experts 认为有goal of doing imp research的人才是他们的colleagues.
P2：？
C：如果有any expert wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences 的话，大多数其他的experts会认为这个将科学大众化的解说者不再是他们的real colleague.
为何会出现这样的结论呢，一定是在大多数experts看来，real colleague 与“将科学解说得大众化”之间有什么关系。而正解D恰好揭示了这样的逻辑关系，即experts认为这种将科学大众化的人通常缺少做重要的新研究的动力，因而不再视他们为real colleague。就好像你致力于阐释清楚前人的思想，就很难分出精力来做出新的创造。B选项说他们嫉妒那些人所以不将他们视作colleague...这个其实有点out of scope，不知道这样解释你可否接受？

cyvivi · 发表于 2013-5-23 13:19:06

ldv 发表于 2013-5-22 17:11
这道题我开始也做错了。。不过后来思考了一下发现自己一开始其实没有太读懂题。这题目是：
P1：通常说，exp ...

恩，谢谢你啊

ldv · 发表于 2013-5-23 14:42:12

ldv 发表于 2013-5-22 17:11
这道题我开始也做错了。。不过后来思考了一下发现自己一开始其实没有太读懂题。这题目是：
P1：通常说，exp ...

^^不客气~~

xdf逻辑分册里的一题

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块