ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4246|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD15-Q30 求解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-6 02:52:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
?30. GWD21-Q30:

?In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars.Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow.The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.


?Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?


A.A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.

B.Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.

C.Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.

D.Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or, another sled.

E.Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.

本人觉得是A,因为还有小孩用traditional wooden sleds,injured 的小孩可能是那些用traditional wooden sleds的。
答案:C
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-6-6 03:56:18 | 只看该作者
In GMAT CR question, when the author says A is better than B, the assumption is that he or she is comparing A and B under IDENTICAL conditions. A quick way to weaken the argument is to point out the comparison is UNFAIR since the conditions for the comparison are NOT identical. C does just that.

A is not the correct answer since the author does not deny that wooden sleds are still in use, although they are less popular than the plastic ones. You cannot weaken a conclusion by repeating what is said or implied in the stimulus.
板凳
发表于 2011-6-6 10:21:50 | 只看该作者
LZ首先A有一个重大的问题,A只不过说是A few children still use traditional wooden sleds,这是很小的一部分,而题目中说的受伤的增长是much higher, 所以是不能削弱的,其余的同意LS的观点
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-6 10:35:23 | 只看该作者
感激。谢谢楼上。
5#
发表于 2011-9-12 15:43:57 | 只看该作者
精辟~我愿意为我懂了的……看完才知道没明白本质~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-20 19:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部