ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In virtually any industry, technological improvements increase labor productivity, which is the output of goods and services per person-hour worked. In Parland's industries, labor productivity is significantly higher than it is in Vergia's industries. Clearly, therefore, Parland's industries must, on the whole, be further advanced technologically than Vergia's are.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2034|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] 羞耻地问一下各位大神,一下几句话怎么翻译,或者逻辑术语是什么

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-9-10 15:45:55 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
(A) It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one of the
pieces of information provided in its support.(好像是断章取义)
(B) It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is
inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim.(自相矛盾????)
(C) It takes one possible cause of a condition to be the actual cause of that
condition without considering any other possible causes.(不当归因???)
(D) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that happened only
after the condition already existed.(循环论证????)
(E) It makes a distinction that presupposes the truth of the conclusion that
is to be established.(猜不出来了)

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2016-9-11 11:20:48 | 只看该作者
自己顶一下听说就会招来大神
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2016-9-12 10:32:55 | 只看该作者
继续顶。。。。
地板
发表于 2016-9-12 15:58:17 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-9-12 19:07:44 | 只看该作者
elusive 发表于 2016-9-12 15:58
大意
A:就是说结论只不过是论据的的变形。不是断章取义!
B:就是说支持一个立场的证据和支持这个立场的其 ...

谢谢大侠!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 06:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部