[求助]LSAT-12-2-6 (藕见过的最短的逻辑题）

题干虽然短，但实在搞不清A为什么错？！答案给的是E.

6. Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a health hazard; therefore, governments should ban all advertisements that promote smoking.

Which one of the following principles, if established, mast strongly supports the argument?

(A) Advertisements should not be allowed to show people doing things that endanger their health.

(B) Advertisers should not make misleading claims about the healthfulness of their products.

(C) Advertisements should disclose the health hazards associated with the products they promote.

(D) All products should conform to strict government health and safety standards.

(E) Advertisements should promote only healthful products.

烟广告不一定要出现人的。故不存在showing people做什麽事的问题

想了好久，终于明白了，但 藕觉得这里不是一个存在不存在的问题，而是一个有关/无关的问题。

原文禁止的是促销烟的广告，A讲的是人做有害自己健康的事的广告。两者是不搭旮的，所以A是无关选项。

再问lawyer一个问题，看这题时，你是读完A,马上就知道它错的吗？如果是，除了直觉外，你还有什么其他方面的评判标准？