- UID
- 1164334
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-10-16
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
我当时也是卡在AC。不够后来记得CD的逻辑书里有过,限定定语把研究对象分成两组。先不考虑意思
A 里面volunteers who said they had acted fairly in choosing the easy task, 这个从句把A里面要研究的对象清晰的指出来了,那种觉得选择了简单事挺公平的人。文中有提到这种人。
C里面volunteers who were assigned to do the hard task and felt that the assignment was unfair
取非的时候
A 取非是 NONE of the volunteers who said they had acted fairly in choosing the easy task said that it was unfair for someone else to do so.没有任何一个捡了便宜不卖乖的破小孩当他们变成做吃亏一族的时候觉得不公平,也就是全体捡便宜的人都认同自己如果吃亏也是公平的,那么作者说人们在自己身上和别人身上用不一样的道德评价就不成立了。应为捡便宜我也觉得公平,吃亏我也觉得公平,那我就是一视同仁,并不像作者说的那样。由此,作者的结论breakdown.
C 取非是NONE of the volunteers who were assigned to do the hard task and felt that the assignment was unfair 吃了亏的组没有人觉得自己吃亏。跟A很像,但是这只涉及了一组人,那另外一组捡便宜的人并没有提到,只要那组人仍然觉得自己没有不公平,作者的论点还是成立的。
这是我的理解 |
|