|
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were extended periods when the Darfir Republic's currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world's most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir's manufactured products a bargain on world markets, and Darfir's exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.
Which of the following, if true, provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt that the politicians' recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?
(A) Several of the politicians now recommending that the pundra be allowed to become weak made that same recommendation before each of the last two periods of currency weakness. (B) After several decades of operating well below peak capacity, Darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels. (C) The economy of a country experiencing a rise in exports will become healthier only if the country's currency is strong or the rise in exports is significant. (D) Those countries whose manufactured products compete with Darfir's on the world market all currently have stable currencies. (E) A sharp improvement in the efficiency of Darfir's manufacturing plants would make Darfir's products a bargain on world markets even without any weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies.
OA:B
各位大神，这个题我不太理解B的意思。看了一些网站的解释也没理解透。After several decades of operating well below peak capacity, Darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels 这句话的意思怎么理解比较好？我能理解如果该国的出口能力已经达到上限，货币再贬值也没用。但是B选项貌似不是这个意思？产能接近峰值了，那么正好可以多出口呀？
谢谢！
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2022-7-23 21:11:45
收藏
收藏
楼主
