一套让我蛋疼的题目，各位牛人帮忙

chrislmh · 发表于 2013-2-6 20:27:17

Juniorbiomedical researchers have long assumed that their hirings and promotions dependsignificantly on the amount of their published work.

eople responsible for making hiring andpromotion decisions in the biomedical research field, however, are influencedmuch more by the overall impact that a candidate's scientific publications haveon his or her field than by the number of those publications.
Theinformation above, if accurate, argues most strongly against which of thefollowing claims?
A.Even biomedical researchers who are just beginning their careers are expectedalready to have published articles of major significance to the field.
B.Contributions to the field of biomedical research are generally considered tobe significant only if the work is published.
C. The potential scientific importance of not-yet-published work issometimes taken into account in decisions regarding the hiring or promotion ofbiomedical researchers.
D.People responsible for hiring or promoting biomedical researchers canreasonably be expected to make a fair assessment of the overall impact of acandidate's publications on his or her field.
E. Biomedical researchers can substantially increase their chancesof promotion by fragmenting their research findings so that they are publishedin several journals instead of one.
答案选E,我选C。
我认为题目在问如果材料说的是正确的，那么以下那个是不可能的？（与材料有冲突）
逻辑链应该是：升级要考虑的是发飙论文的质量，并不是数量
但是不知道为什么答案会是这样。。。。。。

slgbond · 发表于 2013-2-6 23:26:10

奇怪，楼主逻辑链基本是对的，为啥选错，呵呵

原文：初级的生物医学工作者长期认为：他们的雇佣和晋升很大程度上依赖于出版著作的数量。但是，在生物医学领域负责招聘和晋升的人决策时影响受科学出版物整体影响多于出版物的数量。

原文的结论是：not the number of those publications.

题目：上面的信息，如果准确，下面哪个观点最能强烈反对（上面的信息）
选项：
A 即使刚开始工作的小研究人员也能发表文章，和出版物的数量无关，排除
B 只有发表了研究才有意义，和出版物的数量无关，排除
C 尚未发表的有潜在重要性的著作，和出版物的数量无关，排除
D 公正的评估the overall impact ，这是support了，不是against，和题问反了
E 把研究发现分割在几个杂志上发表，几个代替一个。
这个不是说，数量increase了吗，正好反对了结论 the overall impact=not the number of those publications.

一套让我蛋疼的题目，各位牛人帮忙

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()