一个又懒又没毅力的人的最后一招

一个月没来cd, 发现又多了那么多牛分和牛人心经，有很多差不多也是和自己一起开始的，心里难过得要命，为什么我就这么没毅力呢?几个月都坚持不下来，真是没用！考试在即，不想再拖了，只好厚着脸皮用记日记的方式来鞭策自己，无论如何，都要给所有关心我的人一个交待。

我两个月前og的阅读和语法看过一遍，后来转作lsat逻辑，完成了24套，到圣诞节就开始颓废了，到现在一个多月里整天打游戏，惶恐的享受这种充满负罪感的快乐，直到再也承受不了这种负罪感。从今天起我会每天上来汇报，如果我偷懒请大家帮忙骂我鄙视我！

我这个月的计划如下：

每天lsat逻辑一个section做题加总结  一个半小时

         og 语法用菜鸟手册总结第二遍    一个小时

        语法大全20道做题加总结  一个小时

        作文issue和argument各一篇或提纲  一个半小时

        数学30道（og、机经）   半个小时

        pp2做阅读四篇，只做不总结  一个小时

下个月开始做gwd、天山，月底考试.

mm加油！

坚持就是胜利！

加油， 不要偷懒。另外： 感谢MM整理机警。

哇，好开心看到你回来啊，还以为你提前去考试了呢！太好了我们一起加油啊！

加油！~

mage MM +u+u..

一定做到唷!!

真恨不得找个洞钻进去！

我是在没脸跟你联系，而且也怕影响你学习。真高兴看到你一直在努力，你是好样的，我会努力向你看齐的！

楼上各位偶像，你们真是。。。

小妹已经感动的趴下了，废话就不说了，马上汇报昨天的工作

lsat逻辑第25套第一部分：45分钟  错7个 均是阅读难度 逻辑推理基本没有太大问题

og语法将主谓一致总结完毕，强烈感谢菜鸟手册的作者。

语法大全20道 30分钟 错三个 主要是同位语和独立主格部分太薄弱

数学og30道 25分钟 全对

pp2阅读4篇 40分钟 错5个 大概是文章没看太懂

作文只完成了issue，就已经一个半小时了，argument没写，自我批评一下

贴上这篇写了一个半小时的作文，希望走过路过进来帮小妹修改修改

“If the primary duty and concern of a corporation is to make money, then conflict is inevitable when the corporation must also acknowledge a duty to serve society.”

Recently, there is much concern over the issue of which is the major duty of an organization? To fulfill its obligation to society or to maximize profits? In fact, the issue of the role of corporations is a sort of complex. While it is true that organizations tend to act not on behalf of the environment or the public at large, but on behalf of their own short-term economic and political interest, often in other instance, this argument may not be valid. As far as I am concerned, I believe this conflict is not irreconcilable, an organization can become even more successful by actively meet the demand of the general public. My point of view can be greatly substantiated by the following discussions.

Undeniably, in this highly competitive, individualistic society, managers are under increased pressure from shareholders to generate higher and higher levers of return on investment in the short run, conflicts between self interest and public welfare is inevitable. For example, organizations pay less attention to customers' rights and interests, employees' longtime development and the welfare of their immediate community, let alone such more general responsibilities as protecting the environment.

However, companies are taking steps to remedy the problem. They realized that the duty to do well and to do good are back-coupling. For instance, rather than reduce the workers to cogs of machinery, a great number of firms are seeking to "enrich" the job by making it more satisfying and meaningful. This approach not only realizes companies' responsibilities but also improves employee productivity and morale.

Moreover, as to the issue of protecting environment, many companies find that what is good for environment is also good to their bottom line. These firms have come to see toxic waste as a sign of inefficient production. Dow chemical estimates that it saves $3 million a year from recycling a toxic solvent used to make its Verdict herbicide. Such efforts are not cheap, but they pay off. Notes Richard Mahoney, "our initiative and commitments to environment protection will, over the long time, make us more efficient, more cost-effective and more competitive."

To sum up the above mentioned reasons, we may safely draw the conclusion that corporations have duties both to do well and to do good. By fulfilling their responsibilities to the community and general public, companies can become even more successful.

建議mage..也可以順便發在awa區

應該會有人改D