ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5835|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教GWD31-4-Q3-Q6

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-12 11:00:00 | 只看该作者

请教GWD31-4-Q3-Q6

Q3 to Q6:

      Extensive research has shown

       that the effects of short-term price

       promotions on sales are themselves

Line       short-term.  Companies’ hopes that

  (5)      promotions might have a positive

aftereffect have not been borne

out for reasons that researchers

have been able to identify.  A price

promotion entices only a brand’s

 (10)      long-term or “loyal” customers;

people seldom buy an unfamiliar

brand merely because the price is

reduced.  They simply avoid paying

more than they have to when one of

 (15)      their customary brands is temporar-

ily available at a reduced price.  A

price promotion does not increase

the number of long-term customers

of a brand, as it attracts virtually

 (20)      no new customers in the first place.

       Nor do price promotions have linger-

       ing aftereffects for a brand, even

negative ones such as damage to

a brand’s reputation or erosion of

 (25)      customer loyalty, as is often feared.

      So why do companies spend so

much on price promotions?  Clearly

price promotions are generally run

at a loss, otherwise there would

 (30)      be more of them.  And the bigger

the increase in sales at promotion

prices, the bigger the loss.  While

       short-term price promotions can

have legitimate uses, such as

(35)         reducing excess inventory, it is the

recognizable increase in sales that

is their main attraction to manage-

ment, which is therefore reluctant

to abandon this strategy despite

its effect on the bottom line.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q3:
                    

The primary purpose of the passage is to

             

  1. compare the arguments in favor of a certain strategy with those against it
  2. attack a certain strategy by enumerating its negative consequences
  3. justify the use of a certain strategy in light of certain criticisms that have been made against it
  4. advocate a particular strategy by arguing against an alternative
  5. explain the effects of a certain strategy and the primary motivations for adopting it

Answer:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q4:
                    

According to the passage, which of the following is the reason why short-term price promotions do not attract new long-term customers to a brand?

             

  1. Short-term price promotions do not produce an increase in sales.
  2. Customers come to regard the promotional price as the fair price and the regular price as excessive.
  3. Most customers select among competing products largely on the basis of price and very few are loyal to any particular brand.
  4. Customers who have not previously bought the promoted brand are almost never persuaded to do so by the short-term price promotions.
  5. Any customers that a brand gains by means of a short-term price promotion are liable to be lost when a competing brand has a similar promotion.

Answer:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q5:

The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (line 40) is provided by

 

  1. the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions

  2. the frequency with which price promotions occur

  3. price promotions’ inability to attract new customers

  4. price promotions’ recognizable effect on sales

  5. the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions

Answer:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q6:
                    

It can be inferred from the passage that if a company ceased to run short-term price promotions for a particular product, an effect of this change would be to

             

  1. reduce excess inventory of the product

  2. lose some of the product’s long-term customers

  3. reduce the product’s overall sales

  4. inhibit growth in the number of the product’s customers

  5. threaten the product’s profitability

这里想请教大家第5题的思路,这里的bottom line是指不盈不亏么?怎么理解题干?

推荐
发表于 2006-7-12 13:30:00 | 只看该作者

这里的bottom line 和我们通常所说的 the bottom line (meaning the most important fact) 有所不同. 这里应该是指 financial report 上的最后一条线. 也就是和你所说的盈亏关系. 其实读了最后一句, 即使对这个概念不熟也是可以做出来的. despite 引出一个对比. 这里解释了一些 short term price promotion 的好处 然后说这就是managers 不肯抛弃它的理由仅管....   那这里的仅管从前后文可推出是和 profit 有关. 这里的题干写法也有玄机. 算是GWD 中常出的比较绕的写法. 是说文中由方面可证明short term price promotion 是亏钱的. 所以并不是问 effect on the bottom line 内容. 定位在 "otherwise there would be more of them"  答案得出B.

板凳
发表于 2006-7-12 13:41:00 | 只看该作者

补充一下. 上面说的不好. 应该说题目是问. 由哪里可以看出 short term price promotion 对盈亏的关系. 定位点还是一样. otherwise there would be more of them   但是就是说  more- 赚钱. less- 亏. 所以 答案B

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-12 13:50:00 | 只看该作者

版主,谢谢你的解释,但是我觉得你没有说清楚,题目难道不是问:"promotion对盈亏的作用的证据由以下的哪个提供"么?

我对最后一句的理解是:managers 不愿意抛弃这种方法 despite它对盈亏没影响甚至是负面的影响,那这个负面的影响难道不是之前提出的"And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss"么?

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-12 13:52:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sen4sun在2006-7-12 13:41:00的发言:

补充一下. 上面说的不好. 应该说题目是问. 由哪里可以看出 short term price promotion 对盈亏的关系. 定位点还是一样. otherwise there would be more of them   但是就是说  more- 赚钱. less- 亏. 所以 答案B

不好意思啊版主,我发贴时候还没有看到你这条,现在明白了,题目问的是"事实上的证据"而不是"推导出的东西",所以你的那个定位才是正确的.多谢你的指点!!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-12 13:54:33编辑过]
6#
发表于 2006-8-14 13:07:00 | 只看该作者

谢过!

问:evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line”;

文章:despite
   
its effect on the bottom line.

个人理解:

despite: manager不想放弃这个策略“price promotions”, despite...;所以,despite后头无论是啥子东西,都是对这一策略不好的因素

问evidence,是事实类的东西,排除A

其次,问EVIDENCE,算细节,定位最后一段;末段唯一否定price promotion的论据就只有“otherwise there would be more.”--> B选项


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-14 13:08:43编辑过]
7#
发表于 2012-10-22 19:28:54 | 只看该作者
二楼分析太好了,顶~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-6 09:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部