ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1575|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文互改] Argue14 求拍砖

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-9 21:14:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
14) The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine.

A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising firms studied, those whose executives reported needing no more than 6 hours of sleep per night had higher profit margins and faster growth. These results suggest that if a business wants to prosper, it should hire only people who need less than 6 hours of sleep per night.

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.





In this article, the author considers that there is a relation between the amount of sleep and the success of a company.What is more, this author argues that in order to keep high profit of a company, the boss should only hire those employees who need to sleep 6 hours or less per night.However, some assumptions that the author made are less convincing.



Based on the result of a recent study, the author deduces that there is a negative correlation between sleeping hour and the success of the company.The author is assuming that the result of this study is convincing enough.However, with a number of information about this study still remains unclear, we should rethink about if the result of the study is credible.Though this study includes both male and female, no information shows the proportion of sex ration.Besides, no specific evidence tells us anything about the age group of those people who are involved in this study.What is more, their health condition remains unknown.Since the sleep hour is less likely to be the only factor that has an effort on the working performance, the author should put more evidence into his or her consideration.



Even though the result of this study is convincing, it is unfair to relate the performance of a company to a kind of people who just sleep 6 hours.The author seems to infer that those who sleep 6 hours a day would make great contributions to the success of a firm.However, this is less likely to be true.Those people who need less sleep per day have more time than other people and they can do more things than others, but that have no direct relation with their work performance.Perhaps those people who need less sleeping hours put much of their time to play video games or watch TV, instead of extra hours of working. Maybe a person who need less sleep does put more hour on work, but his poor working skill never guarantee that he is going to do more work than others. No evidence shows that the relationship between the sleep hours a person need and his or her work ability.



By assuming that hiring people who need 6 hours or less sleep per day, the author means that this is the only factor to lead a success company.However, the success of a company is a complex task.Actually, many factors work together to make this achievement but it is less likely to be the out come of a single reason.For example, an outstanding leader is likely to make great contribution to the success of a firm.To make wonderful profit, team work is also important.We could hardly any see a company whose staff quarrel with each other all the time and have no team work win a fantastic cash flue.To enhance working efficiency, workers need skills and experience.If a company does not have these things but only staff who are able to sleep less than 6 hours a day, it is less likely to make success.



To sum up, this argument is based on poor assumption instead of an objective view.In order to make the argument more convincing, the author needs to do more research. What is more, that author need to put more factors into his or her consideration.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-10-10 00:33:48 | 只看该作者
there is a negative correlation between sleeping hour and the success of the company.这个信息不是题目本身有的,是你自己的推断,最好不要这么写吧,虽然题目是说少于六个小时,但也不说就是负相关的关系。】
第二段中,你没有说清楚调查的男女比例和年龄状况跟调查结果的关系,也就是说如果题目给了你所说的这些信息,是不是这个调查就一定可信了
, instead of extra hours of working??
板凳
发表于 2012-10-10 00:39:47 | 只看该作者
我觉得LZ在质疑的时候始终要抓住题目的结论。
1.题目认为这300人能代表所有人,有一个前提是这些人不是特别选取的而应当是随机的,也就是说他们的身体条件等能反映平均情况
2.作者还有一个前提是睡眠少于6个小时的管理者一定是把多出的时间用在工作上从而提高工作效率
3.还有一个前提是其他的因素对结果没有影响,而只有睡眠这一个因素不同
4.再一个前提是所有的商业领域管理模式是相同的,否则便不可推及到所有领域
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-10 11:43:56 | 只看该作者
谢谢斑竹~好详细的评价~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-11 04:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部