ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2154|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助新增OG17篇的第2篇

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-4 12:31:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A meteor stream is composed of dust particles that have been ejected from a parent comet at a variety of velocities. These particles follow the same orbit as the parent comet, but due to their differeing velocities they slowly gain on or fall behind the disintegrating comet until a shroud of dust surrounds the entire cometary orbit.


Astronomers have hypothesized that a meteor stream should broaden with time as the dust particles’ individual orbits are perturbed by planetary gravitational fields. A recent computer-modeling experimetn tested this hypothesis by tracking the influence of planetary gravitation over a projected 5,000-year period on the positions of a group of hypothetical dust particles. In the model, the particles were randomly distributed throughout a computer simulation of the orbit of an actual meteor stream, the Geminid. The researcher found, as expected,


that the computer-model stream broadened with time. Coventional theories, however, predicted that the distribution of particles would be increaingly dense toward the center of a meteor stream. Surpringly, the computer-model meteor stream gradually came to resemble a thick-walled, hollow pipe.


Whenever the Earth passes through a meteor stream, a meteor shower occurs. Moving at a little over 1,500,000 miles per day around its orbit, the Earth would take, on average, just over a day to cross the hollow, computer-model Geminid stream if the stream were 5,000 years old. Two brief periods of peak meteor activity during the shower would be observed, one as the Earth entered the thick-walled “pipe” and one as it exited.


There is no reason why the Earth should always pass through the stream’s exact center, so the time interval between the two bursts of activity would vary from one year to the next.


Has the predicted twin-peaked activity been observed for the actual yearly GEminid meteor shower? The Geminid data between 1970 and 1979 show just such a bifurcation, a secondary burst of meteor activity being clearly visible at an average of 19 hourse (1,200,000 miles) after the first burst. The time intervals between the bursts suggest the actual Geminid stream is about 3,000 years old.

83. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following would most probably be observed during the Earth’s passage through a meteor stream if the conventional theories mentioned in line 18 were


(A) Meteor activity would gradually increase to a single, intense peak, and then gradually decline.


(B) Meteor activity would be steady throughout the period of the meteor shower.


(C) Meteor activity would rise to a peak at the beginning and at the end of the meteor shower.


(D) Random bursts of very high meteor activity would be interspersed with periods of very little activity.


(E) In years in which the Earth passed through only the outer areas of a meteor stream, meteor activity would be absent.


答案是A。我的问题是A的gradually decline文中哪里有显示?麻烦大家帮忙看下。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-10-10 22:01:09 | 只看该作者
不知道能不能讲清楚
conventional theories, however, predicted that the distribution of particles would be increaingly dense toward the center of a meteor stream.----传统观点认为是中间密集的
the computer-modelmeteor stream gradually came to resemble a thick-walled, hollow pipe.----这个理论认为是中间空的,周围密集
也就是这样,地球在穿过的时候经历了两次流行雨
所以,如果按照传统观点,想象一下~ 穿过去的时候应该遭受更多的meteor activity 出来的时候逐渐变稀疏了 decrease the meteor activity
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-17 08:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部