ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1276|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道逻辑题~求助

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-15 15:58:39 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
From 1979 to 1989, beverage containers explained a steadily decreasing percentage of the whole weight of household rubbish in America. The increasigly widespread use of recycling aluminum and glass was responsible for most of this decline. However, though aluminum recycling was more widely used in this period than glass recycling, it was found that the weight of glass bottles in household rubbish declined by a larger percentage than the wight of aluminum cans.
Which of the following, if true of the America in the period 1978 to 1988, most helps to account for the finding?
A Glass bottles are significantly heavier than aluminum cans of comparable size.
C Manufacturers replaced many glass bottles,but few aluminum cans, with plastic containers.
答案是C 我选A   A 为什么不对啊?? 求解
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-16 15:39:08 | 只看该作者
没人理我··顶一下啊~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-18 16:23:38 | 只看该作者
求帮助
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-20 11:06:08 | 只看该作者
顶顶顶
5#
发表于 2012-8-20 15:56:47 | 只看该作者
题目只是说alumnius cans和glass bottles在回收垃圾里占主导,并没有说cans和bottles是同样的数量减少,这里就是你臆断出来的了。举个例子,alumniums cans减少的比例特别少,而glass bottle减少比例特别大,显然每个瓶子的重量的偏差也不能解释文中的现象。
C选项显然可以解释。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-15 00:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部