Suppose the number of manager is 1, and the number of director is n, if we can caculate n, surely we can find the percentage of directors for (1): S(m) + n* S(d) = (S(m) + 5000)*(1+n); for (2): S(m) + n * S(d) = (S(d) - 15000) *(1+n);
Suppose the number of manager is 1, and the number of director is n, if we can caculate n, surely we can find the percentage of directors for (1): S(m) + n* S(d) = (S(m) + 5000)*(1+n); for (2): S(m) + n * S(d) = (S(d) - 15000) *(1+n);
Suppose the number of manager is 1, and the number of director is n, if we can caculate n, surely we can find the percentage of directors for (1): S(m) + n* S(d) = (S(m) + 5000)*(1+n); for (2): S(m) + n * S(d) = (S(d) - 15000) *(1+n);
for (1), replace x ==> 12u = 8y + 12 ==> 3*4*u = 4*2*y+ 3*4, we can only sure 3 is a factor is y but can't sure 2 or 2*2 is also a factor of y. LCD not sure. for (2), replace y ==> x = 8*3*4*z + 3*4= (3*4)(8z+1), as x must be divided by 3*4, we can sure know the LCD is 3*4. because y already includes 3*4 as a factor.
for (1), replace x ==> 12u = 8y + 12 ==> 3*4*u = 4*2*y+ 3*4, we can only sure 3 is a factor is y but can't sure 2 or 2*2 is also a factor of y. LCD not sure. for (2), replace y ==> x = 8*3*4*z + 3*4= (3*4)(8z+1), as x must be divided by 3*4, we can sure know the LCD is 3*4. because y already includes 3*4 as a factor.