ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1684|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 一道逻辑题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-8-20 10:40:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?                                    
  • ASmithtown University's fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
  • BThis year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university's fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
  • CThis year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university's fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
  • DThe majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
  • EMore than half of the money raised by Smithtown University's fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

想问下A正确答案的 逻辑是不是这样的:因为S大学跟其他大学找less-likely donate 的成功率人 频率一样  说明S大学在找这些曾经未捐款的成功率是处于一个平均值 往往处于平均值之上的都是优秀的fundraiser 所以就说明S大学的80%成功率都是找的以前的熟儿人  所以就加强了文章结论 是这么理解的么?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-8-22 19:00:40 | 只看该作者
看了LZ的解释才明白了这道题为什么应该选A~这样理解逻辑很顺啊
当时错选了D,第二次做还是觉得D没问题,能否解释一下~~~MUA~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-25 14:49:13 | 只看该作者
mygg_1314 发表于 2013-8-22 19:00
看了LZ的解释才明白了这道题为什么应该选A~这样理解逻辑很顺啊
当时错选了D,第二次做还是觉得D没问题,能 ...

D说 为SU大学集资的大部分捐款是来自之前从来没给大学捐款的捐款人  这样说明这些集资人争取过来的金钱 扩大了 集资的基数 转而说明这些集资人是成功的 不削弱了么 0 0  我是这么理解的!!!不知道对否!
地板
发表于 2013-8-25 18:40:10 | 只看该作者
ljwqlcl881703 发表于 2013-8-25 14:49
D说 为SU大学集资的大部分捐款是来自之前从来没给大学捐款的捐款人  这样说明这些集资人争取过来的金钱  ...

多谢多谢~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-30 22:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部