ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3449|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教请教-OG11紫皮第56题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-1 12:25:00 | 只看该作者

请教请教-OG11紫皮第56题

56.  Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meatHowever, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world averageper capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world averageand it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Thereforesince per capita income continues to risewhereas domestic grain production will not increaseGortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially

(B)  The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country's years of growing prosperity.

(C)  The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels

(D)  In Gortland, neither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls

(E)  People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain

固然E选项也不失逻辑。

但是是否还需要一个前提--人口的稳定或者增长呢?因为上升的是per capita的消费量,但是结论确是针对总量够不够做出的 ,因此是否需要一个前提:人数是常数或者增长呢?(如果人口下降,很有可能消费总量也下降的阿)当初没仔细看,所以选了B。

请牛人指教 ~~

沙发
发表于 2008-8-7 23:19:00 | 只看该作者

我也不懂,因为我一开始也错了这题。

帮顶。

板凳
发表于 2008-8-8 10:38:00 | 只看该作者

楼主,我不是NN 我们共同探讨,你一问我还有点晕!

其实在说per capita的时候已经把人口变化因素考虑进去了,以前的自给自足,也可以是per capita 的自给自足。per capita's varying is relatede to the total number of grain and meat. no matter the population of Gortland changed or not,per capital已经把另外两个量的变化体现在这个变量上了。 如不不考虑评价量,只考虑人数或重量,其实是无法知道是不是自给自足的。(不知道说清楚没有,好像有点绕)

所以我理解题目的意思是以前和现在都在per capital这个变量上来作比较。然后是考虑meat和grain的关系。所以选E

地板
发表于 2008-8-8 11:25:00 | 只看该作者

肉+谷=消费

结论:

肉上升,谷物产量减少----->进口谷物

谷物上升,肉不够吃------>进口肉

E取非:肉上升,谷物产量少但吃得也少----->不用进口谷物,削弱原文

另外一个同理

其实部取非也能想明白,肉多了,谷物产量少而吃了还是一样多,自然要进口。但如果肉吃多了,谷物吃少了,谷物产量少也无所谓。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-10 08:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rock19840717在2008-8-8 11:25:00的发言:

肉+谷=消费

结论:

肉上升,谷物产量减少----->进口谷物

谷物上升,肉不够吃------>进口肉

谢谢rock的解释,不过不太不明白你这里列出的两个结论的逻辑关系...这里的是肉上升是消费上升么?他跟逗号后面的谷物产量减少是什么关系?为什么可以得出进口谷物?下面一句也是一样的问题

而且我并不是不能理解E的解释,不过在考试时比较焦急的情况下,有时候很难碰巧按照标准答案的思路去出发,像这里我就是关注了"per capita”,以至于忽视E的可选性,草草一看就过去了。况且我仍然觉得人口仍然是个可影响因素。

请指教,谢谢!

6#
发表于 2008-8-10 15:59:00 | 只看该作者

原文的假定就是产量=消费

肉产量上升(同时也是原文假定为了满足消费上升),谷物产量下降(假定谷物消费还是不变)----->进口谷物。根据是:it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat.

谷物产量上升(同时也是原文假定为了满足消费上升),肉产量就下降(假定消费还是不变)--------->进口肉,同一个根据。

选项E说的是第一个链,其实两个链道理是一样的,这里就是第一个链用上了。

7#
发表于 2008-8-10 18:19:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得之所以不用考虑人口增长与否问题,是因为一开始文中有句话“Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat”。你看,他说很长时间以来都是刚刚好达到自给自足,因该说明现在仍然是谷物和肉都是刚够用吧。
8#
发表于 2009-2-19 15:57:00 | 只看该作者
whereas domestic grain production will not increase    这句话在文中有什么作用呢?
9#
发表于 2009-2-24 12:54:00 | 只看该作者
UP
10#
发表于 2009-2-24 15:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sicivi在2008-8-1 12:25:00的发言:

56.  Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meatHowever, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world averageper capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world averageand it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Thereforesince per capita income continues to risewhereas domestic grain production will not increaseGortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially

(B)  The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country's years of growing prosperity.

(C)  The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels

(D)  In Gortland, neither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls

(E)  People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain

固然E选项也不失逻辑。

但是是否还需要一个前提--人口的稳定或者增长呢?因为上升的是per capita的消费量,但是结论确是针对总量够不够做出的 ,因此是否需要一个前提:人数是常数或者增长呢?(如果人口下降,很有可能消费总量也下降的阿)当初没仔细看,所以选了B。

请牛人指教 ~~

个人见解,B的问题在于,取反,人口数量不稳定,那么可能下降或者上升,如果是上升的话。原命题还是成立。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-25 18:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部