求助一道OG CR

freetofay · 发表于 2012-6-16 23:03:56

一直看不明白，求大牛解释！
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the

country and have noticed that in those built before

1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is

generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.

Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930

typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than

carpenters who have worked on hotels built

subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens

the guidebook writer's argument?

(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is

generally far superior to the quality of original

carpentry in other structures, such as houses

and stores.

(B) Hotels built since 1930 can generally

accommodate more guests than those built

before 1930.

(C) The materials available to carpenters working

before 1930 were not signifi cantly different in

quality from the materials available to

carpenters working after 1930.

(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a

building, the less likely that building is to fall into

disuse and be demolished.

(E) The average length of apprenticeship for

carpenters has declined signifi cantly since 1930

lymwddp16 · 发表于 2012-6-17 00:24:59

答案选的什么啊？？

freetofay · 发表于 2012-6-17 01:14:30

选D。这道题是我做了这么多逻辑题，真真正正的没搞清逻辑关系的一道。

lymwddp16 · 发表于 2012-6-17 10:06:32

其实题干不难但我是用排除法ABCE肯定不对做出的、、、

clair1107 · 发表于 2012-6-17 10:33:48

事实：1930年之前建的闭1930年之后件的质量好
结论：1930前的working更skill, 付出更多
削弱：并不是因为有更多技巧或更多努力造成的质量好，还有其他原因造成质量好

A.事实
B. 无关事实
C. 不削弱
E. 无关事实

我自己的理解啊不知道能不能说得通？

freetofay · 发表于 2012-6-17 12:39:14

这道题的Assumption太诡异了...

求助一道OG CR

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()