ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1924|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[考古] GWD 鸟飞翔的起源理论

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-6-13 18:20:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD27-Q 3 to Q6:



Two opposing scenarios,



the “arboreal” hypothesis and



the “cursorial” hypothesis, have



Line traditionally been put forward con-



(5)cerning the origins of bird flight.



The “arboreal” hypothesis holds



that bird ancestors began to fly



by climbing frees and gliding



down from branches with the



(10) help of incipient feathers: the



height of trees provides a good



starting place for launching flight,



especially through gliding. As



feathers became larger over time,



(15) flapping flight evolved and birds



finally became fully air-borne.



This hypothesis makes intuitive



Sense, but certain aspects are



Troubling. Archaeopteryx (the



(20) earliest known bird) and its



maniraptoran dinosaur cousins



have no obviously arboreal



adaptations, such as feet fully



adapted for perching. Perhaps



(25) some of them could climb trees,



but no convincing analysis has



demonstrated how Archaeopteryx



would have both climbed and



flown with its forelimbs, and there



(30) were no plants taller than a few



meters in the environments where



Archaeopteryx fossils have been



found. Even if the animals could



climb trees, this ability is not



(35) synonymous with gliding ability.



(Many small animals, and even



some goats and kangaroos,



are capable of climbing trees



but are not gliders.) Besides,



(40) Archaeopteryx shows no obvi-



ous features of gliders, such as



a broad membrane connecting



forelimbs and hind limbs.



The “cursorial”(running)



(45) hypothesis holds that small



dinosaurs ran along the ground



and stretched out their arms for



balance as they leaped into the



air after insect prey or, perhaps,



(50) to avoid predators. Even rudi-



mentary feathers on forelimbs



could have expanded the arm’s



surface area to enhance lift



slightly. Larger feathers could



(55) have increased lift incrementally,



until sustained flight was gradu-



ally achieved. Of course, a leap



into the air does not provide the



acceleration produced by drop-



(60) ping out of a tree; an animal



would have to run quite fast



to take off. Still, some small



terrestrial animals can achieve



high speeds. The cursorial



(65) hypothesis is strengthened by



the fact that the immediate the-



ropod dinosaur ancestors of



birds were terrestrial, and they



had the traits needed for high



(70) lift off speeds: they were small,



agile, lightly built, long-legged,



and good runners. And because



they were bipedal, their arms



were free to evolve flapping flight,



(75) which cannot be said for other



reptiles of their time.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Q 3:



The primary purpose of the passage is to







A.present counterevidence to two hypotheses concerning the origins ofbird flight



B.propose and alternative to two hypotheses concerning the origins of bird flight



correct certain misconceptions about hypotheses concerning theorigins of bird flight



C.(missing)



D.refute a challenge to a hypothesis concerning the origins of bird flight



E.evaluate competing hypotheses concerning the origins of bird flight



Answer:



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Q 4:



The passage presents which of the following facts as evidence that tends to undermine the arboreal hypothesis?







A.Feathers tend to become larger over time



B.Flapping flight is thought to have evolved gradually over time



C.Many small animals are capable of climbing trees.



D.Plants in Archaeopteryx’s known habitats were relatively small



E.Leaping into the air does not provide as much acceleration as gliding out of a tree



Answer:



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Q 5:



Which of the following is included in the discussion of the cursorial hypothesis but not in the discussion of the arboreal hypothesis?







A.A discussion of some of the features of Archaeopteryx



B.A description of the environment known to have been inhabited by bird ancestors



C.A possible reason why bird ancestors might have been engaging in activities that eventually evolved into flight



D.A description of the obvious features of animals with gliding ability



E.An estimate of the amount of time it took for bird ancestors to evolve the kind of flapping flight that allowed them to become completely airborne



Answer:



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Q 6:



The passage suggests which of the following regarding the climbing ability of Archaeopteryx?







A.Its ability to climb trees was likely hindered by the presence of incipient feathers on its forelimbs.



B.It was probably better at climbing trees than were its maniraptoran dinosaur cousins.



C.It had certain physical adaptations that suggest it was skilled at climbing trees.



D.Scientists have recently discovered fossil evidence suggesting it could not climb trees.



E.Scientists are uncertain whether it was capable of climbing trees


答案:  EDCE
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-6-13 18:21:28 | 只看该作者
多谢~~话说怎么没有答案的说
板凳
发表于 2012-6-13 19:47:08 | 只看该作者
新的狗出来了???不是候鸟迁徙么
地板
发表于 2012-6-13 20:23:28 | 只看该作者
多谢!不过这个行间距可真是够大的。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-30 15:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部