我觉得吧,找不到知识点,是因为现在的GMAC SC强调语意逻辑,而你也许陷入那些grammatical nitty-gritties里去了,或者说“只见树木不见森林”。逻辑强调整体性,就说一个句子要表达的含义,结合这个大的逻辑背景来理解每一个小的细节字词。先要像《三国志》说诸葛亮读书那样“观其大略”,而不是说拿到一个句子就庖丁解牛。有时候这句子没有语法错误,可连起来看就是does not make sense,所以句子就不对。
http://www.beatthegmat.com/sc-strategy-and-the-approach-t109899.html#464202 as an analogy, think about listening to a symphony orchestra. if you are a conductor, you have to listen to the entire orchestra at the same time, and you have to detect mistakes. how do conductors do this? primarily through intuition -- no conductor will be able to consciously analyze the instruments one at a time, at the actual pace of a symphony piece. the conductor might be consciously listening to the most conspicuous instruments -- first violin, first cello, and/or whoever is playing a solo or cadenza -- but he or she clearly can't pay conscious attention to all of the instruments at once. that has to be done intuitively. similarly, in sentence correction, the best you can do with conscious rules and thought processes is to pay attention to the few most significant “instruments”. in that respect, your checklist is a pretty good start -- most things in your checklist do qualify as major topics. however, you've got to realize that this checklist is not the end goal; you should view it as an intermediate step in developing the right kind of intuition.
you should concentrate on PRIORITIZING the different SC topics.
the BIG MISTAKE, on SC, is to try to look for EVERYTHING that you have ever seen in the problems/exercises, all at once. this doesn't work -- it's a lot like trying to find all of the words in a word-search puzzle at once. if you've tried that, you'll know that it leads more often than not to finding nothing.
instead, you need to have a short "priority list" of SC error types that you'll look for FIRST, and you need to relegate all other error types to lower "tiers" of this sort of hierarchical thinking.
in particular:
WHEN YOU READ THE PROMPT: - look for the MEANING OF THE SENTENCE - look for PARALLELISM
* FIRST * LOOK FOR THE FOLLOWING ERRORS in the answer choices: - PRONOUNS - MODIFIER PLACEMENT - SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT
* THEN look for everything else.
我是2011年2月上的新东方,一直拖,结果索性转战雅思了。 雅思6.5分,做GMAT感觉虽然有很多单词不认识但是并没有特别的吃力。平时的时候自我感觉思辨力挺好的,在校辩论队混的风生水起的。。。。这次考试的时候不在状态俺是很清楚的,上考场之前还看了一期RUNNINGMAN,现在想想真是不要命的。。。但是知道考的差,可没想到差的掉底了!!!!我平时做题状态不错,特别是逻辑,刚开始做逻辑的时候,看一遍答案就出结果,正确率能到70%,做OG第一遍的时候,一点不夸张。。。当时觉得自己特别的牛!于是乎,就没有太规律的从心态上端正态度,逻辑也基本上没怎么看。就只看了两遍OG,太狂了。。。 总结的失误是:1 没有综合起来做过模考,考砸是应该,别说掌握pace了,咱直接没有pace。 存在侥幸心理。 2 考试之前没有保持状态,一直在看机经,现在想来,考前3,4天都没有做题保持感觉。。。找抽啊 3 数学因为简单OG都没做。。。真心没做,没重视,结果做到中间的时候,可能是比较难得部分了吧,有一坨长的。。因为时间不够了,题目出的特别绕楞是做了3分钟没列出式子来,归根究底是没练,再加上没做模考不知天高地厚。数学大概7个题没做时间就到了。。。还有个原因,俺休息时间超时了4分钟,当时急死了,吃个巧克力上个厕所就超时了,下次决定坚决数学之前不休息了。。。 疑问:1为什么我做语法的时候,感觉非常奇怪,找不到知识点,这是最令我郁闷的!!平时做OG和PREP的时候,我的做题步骤如下:A,看句子主干,找主谓宾,是主谓否一致,看是不是缺成分。 B 看代词指代是否模糊 C 看ing ed结构是否合理,看逻辑主语是否一致,从句是否位置正确,修饰正确。 D 看平行,以及其他的小错误,比如用词啊,固定搭配啊之类的 但是,为什么考试的时候感觉找不到考点?当时的感觉就是懵了,完全,一个题做上个2,3分钟。以至于后面没做完题,41个题我只做到33个就到时间了,有8个题没做。。加上数学没做的就十几个了,一百多分没了 2 想问一下,一般来说,最后一篇阅读之后还有几个题啊?我的第33题是阅读题,最后一篇阅读。我感觉我的题里怎么没几道逻辑?3,4个吧,其余都是语法了。难道逻辑都在后8道了?这个布局是不是就是低分库啊? 3 做不完题是不是就会被扣分?有同考的说最少50分没了。 我特别悔的是,做不完就做不完了,我连蒙也没来得及蒙,还有两分钟就到时间了,我手头上还有个题,就觉得快做出来了再等等。。结果就悲剧了。。。数学语文都这样啊。 现在我特别迷茫。考完后4天我就有开始继续复习,卡点做题,又发现正确率真心没那么糟。现在我一方面有信心(大家从我的描述里也应该能窥见一斑),又不知道该怎么办了,是不是真的是我说的那几个失误,就是考试没调节好导致的,可是也不能这么差吧。现在大三快结束了,我成绩还这样急死了。