ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1646|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 RC3马上就要考试很急很急!!谢谢大家!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-22 16:58:39 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
麻烦大家帮我看一下OG12 RC3的A选项,很急很急马上考试!!谢谢大家!!
      3.The passage implies that which of thefollowing is a possible consequence of a company’s adoption of innovations that increase its ecoefficiency?

(A)       Company profitsresulting from such innovations may be reinvested in that company with noguarantee that thecompany will continue to make further improvements in ecoefficiency.

OG解释是: P suggestes ECO will increase profit,but No suggestion that these companies will then abandon ecoefficiency as agoal

我就不理解了,OG为什么说A选项的意思是这些公司把 abandon ecoefficiency当成目标了?!什么意思啊

再说了文章中也说到这句话了呀,15行“Moreover, there is no

guarantee that increased economic growth from

ecoeffi ciency will come in similarly ecoeffi cient ways,

since in today’s global markets, greater profi ts may

be turned into investment capital that could easily be

reinvested in old-style eco-ineffi cient industries.

所以两个问题,1)OG这个解释不理解 2)A到底为什么错?

马上就要考试很急很急!!谢谢大家帮忙!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-5-5 21:45:14 | 只看该作者
新手,最近也在看这题,希望还有人一起讨论
3.[Inference]细节定位题The passage implies(暗示)that which of the following is a possible consequence of a company’s adoption of innovations that increase its ecoefficiency?公司增E(题目主语)的可能后果

(A)*Company profits resulting from such innovations公司增E may be reinvested in that company with no guarantee
(否定含义)that the company will continue to make further improvements in ecoefficiency. 相当于放弃E为目标
P suggests that ecoefficiency will increase companies' profits(E增P), but no suggestion that these companies will therefore then abandon ecoefficiency as a goal(放弃E为目标).
文章暗示E增P,但并不意味着

放弃E为目标。(E)A company that meets its ecoefficiency goals公司增E is unlikely(否定含义)to invest its increased profits in the development of new and innovative ecoefficiency measures.A
no suggestion that companies are likely to abandon ecoefficient strategies once they have realized increased profits from such strategies.
板凳
发表于 2012-5-9 21:54:58 | 只看该作者
与楼主一样的问题,为什么A 的解释是说他abandon 了。不明白,楼主懂了吗
地板
发表于 2012-5-9 21:59:56 | 只看该作者
【原文】这些革新减少了生产消耗,但不减少产量,也不减少产品在使用时产生的垃圾;其实,多数公司投资生态效能是为了增加利润。而且,不能保证,生态效能带来的经济增长会改善生态环境,因为很多利润被投资到老旧的,不生态的企业。即使是生态企业,发展扩大后,也会比小的、不生态的企业产生更多的垃圾,更破坏生态环境。
【问题】采用生态革新的后果?
【选项】A. 不能保证,公司将生态革新带来的利润用于进一步提高生态效能。
●文中没有讲进一步提高生态效能,只是说很多利润被投资到老旧企业。will come in similarly ecoefficient ways 不等于 further improvements in ecoefficiency,意为:能够同样以生态效能的方式到来,即改善生态环境。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-9 01:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部