陈向东-p175-43 一道削弱题

43.Middletown's police currently remove an apparently abandoned car from the streets about two months after it is reported.the plice have been unfairly criticized for allowing such cars to be vandalized during this period.because it is illegal for car owners to abandon cars on the street,police need not be concerned about protecting auch cars.

which of the following ,if true,most seriously weaken the arguement above?

a)in the past,vehicles abandoned in the town were removed from the streetan an average of four hours after initial reports to police

b)in one recent year,more than 150 abandoned vehicles were vandalized in Middletown,but police made no arrest for those cars

c)some cars initially classified by Middletown's police as abandoned were later reclassifed as stolen vehicles

d)Middletown's understaffed police force must give the deposition of abandoned cars low priority because of the number of violent crimes now commited there

e)in the most recent year for which data are available,there were 28 percent fewer reports of abandoned vehicles than the yearly average for the previous years.

答案为C,

这道题的逻辑关系是:因为车住弃车在马路上是违法的--->所以警察因把车移开,而非考虑给予任何保护或使其合法化.如果这样推理是对的,C应该是支持着一推理:并非车住弃车,而是车被盗了.D也类似了.A,B,E是无关的,

请N人指点

谢谢coopers 解答

我的逻辑作题速度很慢 首先是读懂题意 其次逻辑关系也要分析半天 有时还要把选项的意思理解错误  不知有什么办法可提高解题速度呢 是题目当中的每句话都要细读还是有所策略?作题一定要凭一定的推理关系还是直觉看懂就选?

时间很紧 希望在较短时间内可以突破起来 大家在复习逻辑上有什么好建议吗?

把结论记住，别被选项中的过多细节分散。