ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2241|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP 2007 CR1 第71题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-1-2 15:21:52 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In many corporations,employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to savemoney.  However, many workers who losetheir jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and thesame corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for thatassistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.


Which of thefollowing, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?


(A) Many workers whohave already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.

(B) Many corporationsthat have failed to automate have seen their profits decline.

(C) Taxes andunemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating.

(D) Most of the newjobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did.

(E) The initial investmentin machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings inlabor costs.

答案A

E选项从短期上说明了化代替人工并不能使公司save money个不能算是加强吗


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-1-2 21:50:30 | 只看该作者
Pay attention to the word EVENTUALLY in the last sentence of the passage. We are talking about LONG term effect here, not INITIAL or SHORT-TERM.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-1-3 11:12:37 | 只看该作者
accept
地板
发表于 2012-4-14 16:11:44 | 只看该作者
SdcarNN, 我想请问一下这题的premise和conclusion是什么呀?感觉A虽然是最好的,但也是怪怪的!
5#
发表于 2012-4-14 17:21:20 | 只看该作者
Premise: many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive,
Conclusion: the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.
6#
发表于 2012-4-14 17:46:29 | 只看该作者
再想想好像清楚些了~谢谢sdcarNN~~~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 02:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部