请问如何理解lawyer NN 讲的结论的特殊性和具体性

查了下以前的帖子，有如下的例子和解释

但我还是不是很明白特殊性和具体性有什么区别呢？还是根本就是一样的意思？

110. Robot satellites relay important communications and identify weather patterns. Because the satellites can be repaired only in orbit, astronauts are needed to repair them. Without repairs, the satellites would eventually malfunction. Therefore, space flights carrying astronauts must continue.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?

(A) Satellites falling from orbit because of malfunctions burn up in the atmosphere.

(B) Although satellites are indispensable in the identification of weather patterns, weather forecasters also make some use of computer projections to identify weather patters.

(C) The government, responding to public pressure, has decided to cut the budget for space flights and put more money into social welfare programs.

(D) Repair of satellites requires heavy equipment, which adds to the amount of fuel needed to lift a spaceship carrying astronauts into orbit.

(E) Technical obsolescence of robot satellites makes repairing them more costly and less practical than sending new, improved satellites into orbit.

结论是是否需要送宇航员上天的问题，该结论的特殊性和具体性表现在：是送宇航员，不是别的人。是需不需要的问题，不是有没有，贵不贵的问题。这样ABCD就在该特殊性之外。只有E在讨论需不需要的问题。