- UID
- 612966
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-3-7
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
第三篇issue，求拍。还是写超时了 老问题，表达上总是拿不准，会查google，有什么好办法求赐教
6. A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Should the students are forced by the nation to take the same national curriculum until they go to the college, as the speaker suggest? In a sense, I tend to agree that students gain the same knowledge is a good thing for their education. However, the speaker begs questions by overlooking the crucial role of anticipated problem and unfairly gave them a second priority. In my point of view, both students’ interest and financial and material capabilities of universities are critical for this suggestion out into effect, and an all-side consideration is needed when deciding the precedence.
Admittedly, bring same national curriculum into force is benefit for both students and universities. For students, the same national curriculum would help students to contrast basic knowledge system, such as math, history, and culture of their nations. No matter whether they decide to go to university in the further, fundamental culture literacy would not be a block for their jobs, communications and lives; In university side, it is convenient for admission departments to estimate whether applications have enough qualification to enter universities. A score of a paper, even it can not tell evaluators the student’s comprehensive quality, but at least, it can show the fundamental knowledge of mastery level of the student which would be a element to assess whether the student have ability to achieve the university education, indeed, accepting higher education. For nation, the same curriculum will be a policy to increase the instructed level and decrease the rate of analphabetic.
The result of suggestion seems to be ideal, however, after further thinking, it will bring more opposed voices. First of all, not all universities have enough financial resources and human resources to offer the same national curriculum. Every nation have at least one even more regions which cannot achieve average financial level of the whole nation lacing person qualified to teach, facilities advanced to help. In addition, come countries, like China, which have 56 nations and every nation has their own culture, language. Blinding to force every student to take the same national curriculum would lead to some minorities losing their language and culture, accordingly, arousing contradiction between nations which go against the stable development of country. It is not only going country to the original wishes, but also go against the country’s peace.
Formulation and promotion the same rational curriculum will improve the quality of the population to same extent. Meanwhile, we have to respect each culture of nation, offering enough development space in order to inherit the ancestors’ wisdom. There is a solution as follows. In the basic subject, such as math, chemistry, it would not cause problem result from the same rational curriculum; in the culture subject, such linguistics, history, the government ought to differ from nation to nation.
To sum up, we can see the advantages of requiring every student to take national curriculum, nevertheless, we also can foresee the problem of this suggestion. The first and foremost goal for nation is to balance the favorable and unfavorable in order to avoid the conflict, but also make students benefit from it.
515
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-4-8 21:13:36
收藏
收藏
楼主
