ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from mines. It is possible to extract uranium from seawater, but the cost of doing so is greater than the price that uranium fetches on the world market. Therefore, until the cost of extracting uranium from seawater can somehow be reduced, this method of obtaining uranium is unlikely to be commercially viable.

Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating the argument?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2870|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

An insightful comment abt RC evaluation questions

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-3-3 16:56:39 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
今天在网上搜索一道逻辑题时读到一段话,觉得非常受用,主要是针对一些evaluate arguement的题目,放上来和大家分享:

Quote from "ManhattanGMAT forum":

Evaluating the argument means that you actually have information to know more about whether the argument is valid. If the argument is more valid, then you're strengthening the argument; if the argument is less valid, then you're weakening the argument.

If we were actually to do the research to gain the information represented in the correct answer, then we would be able to determine whether the argument is more or less valid.

Note that, of course, they don't actually tell us which way it goes - each choice just says "whether blah blah blah" meaning the actual information could go either way if the research were done. But if that research were done, and we had the results, then the effect would be to either strengthen or weaken (we don't know which!) the argument!
_________________
Unquote

结合自己做题时的一些问题,有时答案里出现和原文很相似的一段话,因为觉得相关,立即就会将此作为选项, but actually it is wrong, because that answer choice doesn't help, as it addresses the one possibility that has already been considered by the passage.

放道题目给大家感受一下,这也是上面那段话出处的原题:

Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from the mines. It is possible to extract uranium from seawater, but the cost of doing so is greater than the price that Uranium fetches on the world market. Therefore, until the cost of extracting uranium from seawater can somehow be reduced, this method of obtaining uranium is unlikely to be commercially viable.

Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating the argument?

a. Whether the uranium in deposits on land is rapidly being depleted
b. Whether most uranium is used near where it is mined
c. Whether there are any technological advances that show promise of reducing the costs of extracting uranium from seawater d. Whether the total amount of Uranium in seawater is significantly greater than the total amount of uranium on land
e. Whether uranium can be extracted from freshwater at a cost similar to the cost of extracting it from seawater.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-3-29 15:21:00 | 只看该作者
顶!!!谢谢分享!

特别是“结合自己做题时的一些问题,有时答案里出现和原文很相似的一段话,因为觉得相关,立即就会将此作为选项, but actually it is wrong, because that answer choice doesn't help, as it addresses the one possibility that has already been considered by the passage.” evaluate的题目就是老是犯这种毛病,自己还半天想不清楚。


今天在网上搜索一道逻辑题时读到一段话,觉得非常受用,主要是针对一些evaluate arguement的题目,放上来和大家分享:

Quote from "ManhattanGMAT forum":

Evaluating the argument means that you actually have information to know more about whether the argument is valid. If the argument is more valid, then you're strengthening the argument; if the argument is less valid, then you're weakening the argument.

If we were actually to do the research to gain the information represented in the correct answer, then we would be able to determine whether the argument is more or less valid.

Note that, of course, they don't actually tell us which way it goes - each choice just says "whether blah blah blah" meaning the actual information could go either way if the research were done. But if that research were done, and we had the results, then the effect would be to either strengthen or weaken (we don't know which!) the argument!
_________________
Unquote

结合自己做题时的一些问题,有时答案里出现和原文很相似的一段话,因为觉得相关,立即就会将此作为选项, but actually it is wrong, because that answer choice doesn't help, as it addresses the one possibility that has already been considered by the passage.

放道题目给大家感受一下,这也是上面那段话出处的原题:

Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from the mines. It is possible to extract uranium from seawater, but the cost of doing so is greater than the price that Uranium fetches on the world market. Therefore, until the cost of extracting uranium from seawater can somehow be reduced, this method of obtaining uranium is unlikely to be commercially viable.

Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating the argument?

a. Whether the uranium in deposits on land is rapidly being depleted
b. Whether most uranium is used near where it is mined
c. Whether there are any technological advances that show promise of reducing the costs of extracting uranium from seawater d. Whether the total amount of Uranium in seawater is significantly greater than the total amount of uranium on land
e. Whether uranium can be extracted from freshwater at a cost similar to the cost of extracting it from seawater.
-- by 会员 danielleydd (2012/3/3 16:56:39)

板凳
发表于 2012-3-29 16:53:47 | 只看该作者
0-0于是答案是。。。?按理这个理解的话那意思是C应该是错的。。可是感觉其它也都不对。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-2 06:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部