- UID
- 679955
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-10-8
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. However, buying prescription drug coverage, like buying health insurance coverage, is not like buying a car. The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs. Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time; this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.
答案是:The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.
答案通过排除发很容易得出,但是我不理解为什么第一个boldface会是observation,我觉得它是项政策,所以是fact呀
求解答
THX IN ADVANCE. |
|