CXD 一题求助.

crystalvine212 · 发表于 2010-1-23 21:42:23

Some people assert that prosecutors should be allowed to introduce illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials if the judge and jury can be persuaded that the arresting officer was nor aware of violating or did not intend to violate the law while seizing the evidence.This proposed "good-faith exception"would weaken everyone's constitutional protection,lead to less careful police practices, and promote lying by las enforcement officers in court.

The argument above for maintaining the prohibition against illegally obtained evidence assumes that

A . defendants in criminal cases should enjoy greater protection from the law than other citizens do

B. law enforcement authorities need to be encouraged to pursue criminals assiduously

C.the legal system will usually find ways to ensure that real crimes do not go unprosecuted.

D.the prohibition now deters some unlawful searches and seizures

E.courts should consider the motives of law enforcement officers in deciding whether evidence brought forwatd by the officers is admissible in a trial

为什么选D

clarry · 发表于 2010-1-24 13:52:35

假设题其实就是选一个对原文信息起支持作用的必要条件。
D说该禁令目前制止了一些不合法的调查。取非的话，就是该禁令没有制止不合法的调查，那么整个结论就推翻了。所以D是个必要条件。
AB都无关，CE是常见的错误答案，有usually,should。

CXD 一题求助.

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()