ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1393|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]大全-B-15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-24 00:05:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]大全-B-15

15.   In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her manager may have to spend up to $100,000 of tax money. Since Civil Service employees know how hard it is to fire them, they tend to loaf. This explains in large part why the government is so inefficient.


It can be properly inferred on the basis of the statements above that the author believes which of the following?


I.     Too much job security can have a negative influence on workers.


II.    More government workers should be fired.


III.   Most government workers are Civil Service employees.


(A) I only


(B) I and III only


(C) II only


(D) I, II, and IIIA


(E) III only


我觉得2,3也可从文中推出啊, 


the government is so inefficient.证明需要裁员


Civil Service employees know how hard it is to fire them, they tend to loaf. This explains in large part why the government is so inefficient.可看出政府雇员大部分是civil service的成员

沙发
发表于 2005-2-24 00:23:00 | 只看该作者
文章只是说This explains in large part why the government is so inefficient.最多也就是说明要裁员,怎么会要裁掉大多的人,也没有说Most government workers are Civil Service employees.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-24 23:03:00 | 只看该作者
多谢tuzq,可能是我想太多了。我从so inefficient推出政府很没有效率,由此得出,需要裁员比较多,以及后边的结论
地板
发表于 2005-2-25 12:23:00 | 只看该作者

这里是推不出需要裁员的。只能推出政府员工被这个政策影响得没有效率。

就算能推出需要裁员。但是也不应该是most 呀。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-26 00:40:00 | 只看该作者

thanks a lot. I get it

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-5 19:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部