逻辑求解

594davidvilla · 发表于 2012-4-3 22:11:53

113. The reforms to improve the quality of public education that have been initiated on the part of suppliers of public education have been insufficient. Therefore, reforms must be demanded by consumers. Parents should be given government vouchers with which to pay for their children’s education and should be allowed to choose the schools at which the vouchers will be spent. To attract students, academically underachieving schools will be forced to improve their academic offerings.

The argument assumes that

A.in selecting schools parents would tend to prefer a reasonable level of academic quality to greater sports opportunities or more convenient location.
B.improvement in the academic offerings of schools will be enforced by the discipline of the job market in which graduation students compete
C.there is a single best way to educate students
D.children are able to recognize which schools are better and would influence their parents’ decisions.
E.schools would each improve all of their academic offering and would not tend to specialize in one particular field to the exclusion of others.

答案：A
思路：本文关键是要把Parents to choose和forced to improve their academic offerings联系起来，文中强调的是只有家长选择学校才能迫使学校提高教学质量，也就是大家认为应该搭起一座桥来，即家长选择看重的是教学质量。否则，家长如果认为其他的原因比教学质量更重要的话，学校是不会提高教学质量的。
A.符合题意。
B.出现了he discipline of the job market新名词，与题目无关。
C.无关。
D.易混淆，文中没有提到children，弱支持本题，不如答案直接有力。
E.无关。

A里面,prefer to后面的sports opportunity和convenient location文中并没有提到。assumption不是必要条件么，怎么理解

594davidvilla · 发表于 2012-4-5 13:50:48

来人帮帮我

逻辑求解

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()