大全-b-16想不明白呢?

16.   Some commentators complain that a “litigation explosion” in the past decade has led to unreasonably high costs for U.S. businesses by encouraging more product liability suits against manufacturers. However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. Statistics show that the number of successful product liability suits has remained almost the same, and the average sum awarded in damages has grown no faster than the inflation rate.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The number of unsuccessful suits has skyrocketed, imposing huge new legal expenses on businesses.

(B) Several of the largest awards ever made in product liability cases occurred within the last two years.

(C) The rise of the consumer movement has encouraged citizens to seek legal redress for product flaws.

(D) Lawyers often undertake product liability cases on a contingency basis, so their payment is based on the size of the damages awarded.（A）

(E) Juries often award damages in product liability suits out of emotional sympathy for an injured consumer.

a怎么weaken了?

哈哈，居然在这里也能碰见你，id都和bbs上的一样！

这道题我凑活给你说说吧，题目说：

“l-p给美国商业造成了没有道理的高成本，因为它鼓励更多的针对制造商的诉讼。但是，这种看法的根据是不牢靠的，因为，调查显示，产品质量诉讼的胜诉量与以前一样，赔偿款的增加也不必通货膨胀来的快（比通胀慢你应该知道意味着什么吧）。”实际上，题目的意思就是“l-p没有增加成本”。

A之所以是削弱，是因为，题目说了，l-p鼓励诉讼，但它只反驳了（消费者）胜诉的诉讼费用没有上升，忽略了（消费者）败诉的诉讼费用的变化。A刚好说了这个，失败的诉讼数量上升，费用增加。

哈哈，就是太巧啦，这里都能遇见你！倍感亲切！！

上午刚开始做逻辑的大全，比og的难不少，很受打击呀。

赫赫，这题我做的时候However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. complaints理解错了，想成了消费者对产品的complaints是based on myth.结论是表达类似于说消费者无理取闹的意思。

现在懂啦，thanks

嗯，好好准备吧。当初我做的时候也惨遭蹂躏。

我28号就考了，虽然考完之后还有更多的事，不过干完一件算一件。哈哈

加油！

考完了别忘了给分享分享经验哪