ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1436|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑困惑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-2-26 12:31:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
magazine Editor: our magazine does not have a liberal bias. it is real that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative opinions, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position. obviously, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal opinions but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse views.
determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine editor's response?
(c) whether in the vent that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews
(d) whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
正确答案是C, 我选D 啊
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-2-26 13:00:21 | 只看该作者
editor:当一书评表达出保守派观点时,我们要获得表达出自由派观点的书评后,才会出版。我们并非倾向于自由派,而是为了给出不同观点。
C:如果书评表达的是自由派观点,是否也要再评一次?(是,说明不偏向,不是,说明偏向。)
D:书到底是清晰的保守派观点还是自由派观点?(针对书评的观点,并非书本身,与书的内容无关)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-19 05:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部