急问各位NN：究竟我有没有做LSAT 逻辑 的必要？

对于LSAT的作用，各位前辈的论述不一，结合我自己的体验又以下几点：

1）时间允许的情况下才有可能用LSAT提高；

2）LSAT和GRE/GMAT的出题机构不是一家，因此思路多有不同，XDF老师和CD上的NN也多是说拿LSAT是来练阅读的；

3）LSAT需要充足的时间和实力来练习，否则很容易受其打击；

4）我同意你的观点，我就是买了LSAT本来雄心勃勃要做，但是后来放弃了，作费费135（从LSAT中摘出的典型题目）中途放弃了，因为有OG足够了，用OG的RC来练阅读，反复总结理解CR，是一样的效果，最忌讳OG没好好复习而贪多嚼不滥的去看LSAT。

复习时间很是宝贵，建议大家权衡利弊，把投入用在最有可能提高产出的内容上来。

FYI

Thank you! mumuwa.

If the two tests are not much related  in terms of logic, then it is really meaningless to go any further.  Thanks again.

    Sorry I can't type Chinese characters fast enough.

It took me more than one hour just to type the question above.

作用不是完全没有，但是因人而异，有的人领悟很快，获益很多，有的人看LSAT的时间少，OG又没下功夫的情况下往往很难受益，反倒有副作用。

但是看OG就不会，反复的看，分类看，结果是一定只有提高，不会浪费时间的。

Does any one has PORSCHE find it hard to type Chinese? Lucky that you need not do AWA in Chinese, haha.

Pls do what you are comfortble to do, and do not take trouble to do what is time-consuming.

Good luck!

nod。我最近做沸沸，就觉得很有收获，最起码对逻辑有了一些认识，而不是象以前觉得只要看懂题目就能做，看不懂就错。所以就看你的时间安排了。

Thank you, folks!

I think I will forget about LSAT, at least for now.

By the way, mumuwa,  Porscheman is just a nickname given by my colleagues. It has nothing to do with the car itself.  Anyway, I don't drive it  b/c it runs too fast.

thaks!

Mindfree