ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4782|回复: 24
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og 12 SC 101 求解答!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-3-26 08:40:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
101. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

(A) Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

(B) An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.

(C) An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.

(D) Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.

(E) Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.



B The sentence structure indicates that the executive, not his or her strategy, causes signs

to be overlooked; the modifier when they do appear is misplaced.

Q1:为什么说修饰语位置不当??

Q2"misinterpreting ones" is also wrong. this should be "them", not "ones". 这是Ron在论坛上分析的,我想问 ones them 的区别,以及one it 的区别,还有就是这里为什么应该改为 them



NN解答~~thx~~~


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-26 08:40:30 | 只看该作者

呼唤baby姐,bat,各种NN,各种大侠~~~
板凳
发表于 2012-3-26 12:59:23 | 只看该作者
飘过~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-26 13:11:47 | 只看该作者
飘过~
-- by 会员 bob9603 (2012/3/26 12:59:23)


。。。。。。略去两个字,你懂的~
5#
发表于 2012-3-26 14:59:28 | 只看该作者
one和it/them的差别在于it和them都是特指,专门指所指代的对象,该对象独一无二,而one是泛指这一类,例如:i bought a red bag, and chantal bought a yellow one. one特指bag这一类东西
i bought a red bad, and chantal borrowed it. it专门指我前面买的那个包,独一无二
对于when they do appear的错放问题,当这个从句放在likely后面的时候,就会导致they指代不明确的问题,因为抛开前面不看,当状语从句置于句末,其SVO中主语若是代词的话,指代顺序是:优先指代主句主语,然后是主句宾语。该主句的宾语是“missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them ”,是可以用they来指代的,而misinterpreting后面的them指代的是前面的signs,就会出现句中指代不一致的问题。
举一个很挫的例子,you can make the problem solved when it do appear ,这句话it就是很明显的指代宾语
个人觉得,当从句中出现代词既不是指代主语也不是指代宾语、然后又会产生指代不明的时候,这个从句是要紧随指代对象的,GMAT讲究精确嘛
个人观点,嘿嘿~
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-26 15:32:43 | 只看该作者
one和it/them的差别在于it和them都是特指,专门指所指代的对象,该对象独一无二,而one是泛指这一类,例如:i bought a red bag, and chantal bought a yellow one. one特指bag这一类东西
i bought a red bad, and chantal borrowed it. it专门指我前面买的那个包,独一无二
对于when they do appear的错放问题,当这个从句放在likely后面的时候,就会导致they指代不明确的问题,因为抛开前面不看,当状语从句置于句末,其SVO中主语若是代词的话,指代顺序是:优先指代主句主语,然后是主句宾语。该主句的宾语是“missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them ”,是可以用they来指代的,而misinterpreting后面的them指代的是前面的signs,就会出现句中指代不一致的问题。
举一个很挫的例子,you can make the problem solved when it do appear ,这句话it就是很明显的指代宾语
个人觉得,当从句中出现代词既不是指代主语也不是指代宾语、然后又会产生指代不明的时候,这个从句是要紧随指代对象的,GMAT讲究精确嘛
个人观点,嘿嘿~
-- by 会员 chantal891121 (2012/3/26 14:59:28)


谢谢详细解答......
one 和 it这个已经比较清晰了,
可是对于 修饰语位置错误的那个...
无论放在likely前还是后我觉得指代都不清晰,我觉得它这里说的位置错误应该是句意歧义什么的,
还有我查了manhattan论坛,Stacey说:
t is not true that the pronoun and the noun have to be in the same case. They can be in different cases. So not a good rule to use.
还是很纠结....
还是受益拉~
7#
发表于 2012-3-26 15:42:24 | 只看该作者
one和it/them的差别在于it和them都是特指,专门指所指代的对象,该对象独一无二,而one是泛指这一类,例如:i bought a red bag, and chantal bought a yellow one. one特指bag这一类东西
i bought a red bad, and chantal borrowed it. it专门指我前面买的那个包,独一无二
对于when they do appear的错放问题,当这个从句放在likely后面的时候,就会导致they指代不明确的问题,因为抛开前面不看,当状语从句置于句末,其SVO中主语若是代词的话,指代顺序是:优先指代主句主语,然后是主句宾语。该主句的宾语是“missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them ”,是可以用they来指代的,而misinterpreting后面的them指代的是前面的signs,就会出现句中指代不一致的问题。
举一个很挫的例子,you can make the problem solved when it do appear ,这句话it就是很明显的指代宾语
个人觉得,当从句中出现代词既不是指代主语也不是指代宾语、然后又会产生指代不明的时候,这个从句是要紧随指代对象的,GMAT讲究精确嘛
个人观点,嘿嘿~
-- by 会员 chantal891121 (2012/3/26 14:59:28)



谢谢详细解答......
one 和 it这个已经比较清晰了,
可是对于 修饰语位置错误的那个...
无论放在likely前还是后我觉得指代都不清晰,我觉得它这里说的位置错误应该是句意歧义什么的,
还有我查了manhattan论坛,Stacey说:
t is not true that the pronoun and the noun have to be in the same case. They can be in different cases. So not a good rule to use.
还是很纠结....
还是受益拉~


-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/3/26 15:32:43)


楼主你看MAN上的解释,他说的是因为they和them不是一个格,和我说的不一样,他说的对,一个句子中的代词确实不需要是同一个格的,只要指代的对象一致就可
我所说的意思就是指代不明确,也可以说是句意歧义,因为后面的那个they也可以指代“missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them ”这个整个,从语法优先上来说,那个they就是应该指代这个整个,和前面的them就指代对象不一样了
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-26 16:06:53 | 只看该作者
one和it/them的差别在于it和them都是特指,专门指所指代的对象,该对象独一无二,而one是泛指这一类,例如:i bought a red bag, and chantal bought a yellow one. one特指bag这一类东西
i bought a red bad, and chantal borrowed it. it专门指我前面买的那个包,独一无二
对于when they do appear的错放问题,当这个从句放在likely后面的时候,就会导致they指代不明确的问题,因为抛开前面不看,当状语从句置于句末,其SVO中主语若是代词的话,指代顺序是:优先指代主句主语,然后是主句宾语。该主句的宾语是“missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them ”,是可以用they来指代的,而misinterpreting后面的them指代的是前面的signs,就会出现句中指代不一致的问题。
举一个很挫的例子,you can make the problem solved when it do appear ,这句话it就是很明显的指代宾语
个人觉得,当从句中出现代词既不是指代主语也不是指代宾语、然后又会产生指代不明的时候,这个从句是要紧随指代对象的,GMAT讲究精确嘛
个人观点,嘿嘿~
-- by 会员 chantal891121 (2012/3/26 14:59:28)




谢谢详细解答......
one 和 it这个已经比较清晰了,
可是对于 修饰语位置错误的那个...
无论放在likely前还是后我觉得指代都不清晰,我觉得它这里说的位置错误应该是句意歧义什么的,
还有我查了manhattan论坛,Stacey说:
t is not true that the pronoun and the noun have to be in the same case. They can be in different cases. So not a good rule to use.
还是很纠结....
还是受益拉~




-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/3/26 15:32:43)



楼主你看MAN上的解释,他说的是因为they和them不是一个格,和我说的不一样,他说的对,一个句子中的代词确实不需要是同一个格的,只要指代的对象一致就可
我所说的意思就是指代不明确,也可以说是句意歧义,因为后面的那个they也可以指代“missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them ”这个整个,从语法优先上来说,那个they就是应该指代这个整个,和前面的them就指代对象不一样了
-- by 会员 chantal891121 (2012/3/26 15:42:24)


我的意思是,指代对象一致不是绝对原则
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-651026-1-1.html
9#
发表于 2012-3-26 18:30:10 | 只看该作者
lz去看看那帖子,刚去WIKI上查了,还是坚持要指代一致
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-26 18:33:48 | 只看该作者
lz去看看那帖子,刚去WIKI上查了,还是坚持要指代一致
-- by 会员 chantal891121 (2012/3/26 18:30:10)



额,可是bat说不一定要一致,manhattan上也表示不是绝对标准,如果一定要一致的话,那个链接上的题目就不好解释了。
我还是比较倾向于bat 和小M的解释,wiki的不好说。
Ron也表示在语法中绝对遵循的法则太少太少。
还是实际问题灵活处理吧。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 12:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部