ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7374|回复: 25
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-1,28,30,50,57综合求解og12-1答案C中分词做定语

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-17 14:30:14 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
28.Building on civilizations that preceded them in coastal Peru, the Mochica developed their own elaborate society, based on the cultivation of such crops as corn and beans, the harvesting of fish and seafood, and the exploitation of other wild and domestic resources.

30.For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

50.According to some analysts,the gain in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a "soft landing",followed by a gradual increase in business activity.

57.It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology:Alvin Toffler,one of the most prominent student of the future,did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock,published in 1970.

以上分词都是做定语就近修饰,那为什么og12-1中C答案就不对呢?

1.The Glass House Mountains in Quensland,Australia,were sighted in 1770 by the English navigator Captain James Cook, naming them supposedly since their sheer wet rocks glistened like glass.

naming做定语修饰JC,不是非常简洁么?

Og解释as the object of a preposition and not the subject of the clause, James Cook does not work as the noun that the verbal phase beginning with naming can describe.

介词的宾语,那come in for a "soft landing和in Future Shock是不是也是介词的宾语啊。

求斑竹指教
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-17 14:31:48 | 只看该作者
当然C中的since不对,如果since改成because是否就正确了
板凳
发表于 2010-1-17 15:07:54 | 只看该作者
28.Building on civilizations that preceded them in coastal Peru, the Mochica developed their own elaborate society, based on the cultivation of such crops as corn and beans, the harvesting of fish and seafood, and the exploitation of other wild and domestic resources.

30.For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

50.According to some analysts,the gain in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a "soft landing",followed by a gradual increase in business activity.

57.It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology:Alvin Toffler,one of the most prominent student of the future,did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock,published in 1970.

以上分词都是做定语就近修饰,那为什么og12-1中C答案就不对呢?

1.The Glass House Mountains in Quensland,Australia,were sighted in 1770 by the English navigator Captain James Cook, naming them supposedly since their sheer wet rocks glistened like glass.

naming做定语修饰JC,不是非常简洁么?

Og解释as the object of a preposition and not the subject of the clause, James Cook does not work as the noun that the verbal phase beginning with naming can describe.

介词的宾语,那come in for a "soft landing和in Future Shock是不是也是介词的宾语啊。

求斑竹指教
-- by 会员 红尘道士 (2010/1/17 14:30:14)


细读28,30,50,57后,不知道你是否体会到分词作定语是用来修饰前面紧接着的名词。

如果这里选C,那么后面的句子就是用来修饰前面的James Cook,但是实际上句子的本意并不是这样,而是要解释Glass House Mountain名字的由来。C使得这个句子有两个重心了:前面说GHM什么时候由谁发现,然后在一个句子里又修饰了发现者。而正确选项之所以正确,是因为它的句子重心一直都是围绕GHM。

具体语法知识我也不太懂,只能从逻辑上体会,权当抛砖引玉之用。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-17 15:18:17 | 只看该作者

如果这里选C,那么后面的句子就是用来修饰前面的James Cook,但是实际上句子的本意并不是这样,而是要解释Glass House Mountain名字的由来。C使得这个句子有两个重心了:前面说GHM什么时候由谁发现,然后在一个句子里又修饰了发现者。而正确选项之所以正确,是因为它的句子重心一直都是围绕GHM。

具体语法知识我也不太懂,只能从逻辑上体会,权当抛砖引玉之用。
-- by 会员 rose86511 (2010/1/17 15:07:54)



照你这么说,上面举的所有例子都有两个重心了?

而且,本题的答案,who so named 也是修饰JC的,为什么不是两个重心了
5#
发表于 2010-1-17 16:25:58 | 只看该作者
如果这里选C,那么后面的句子就是用来修饰前面的James Cook,但是实际上句子的本意并不是这样,而是要解释Glass House Mountain名字的由来。C使得这个句子有两个重心了:前面说GHM什么时候由谁发现,然后在一个句子里又修饰了发现者。而正确选项之所以正确,是因为它的句子重心一直都是围绕GHM。

具体语法知识我也不太懂,只能从逻辑上体会,权当抛砖引玉之用。
-- by 会员 rose86511 (2010/1/17 15:07:54)



照你这么说,上面举的所有例子都有两个重心了?

而且,本题的答案,who so named 也是修饰JC的,为什么不是两个重心了
-- by 会员 红尘道士 (2010/1/17 15:18:17)


呃。。。被你这么一说。。。只是我做这道题时就是像上面那样本能地首先排除了C(no offense)。。。期待大牛。。。
6#
发表于 2010-1-17 16:29:07 | 只看该作者
现在分词不是用来修饰就近词的
就拿你前面例子中的protecting好了。protecting不是修饰equipment或items的,而是表述shields的功能。
现在分词还可以用来做动作伴随,等等

过去分词修饰就近词做后置定语
举个例子,followed原来都是写成which is followed,但是省略写成followed修饰限制前面的名词

这样你就很好明白为什么OG说naming的发出者应该是JC,而原句主语为mountains,不能用naming
7#
发表于 2010-1-17 16:31:46 | 只看该作者
举个例子
In 1770, James Cook saw the mountains, naming them supposedly还能说得过去
In 1770, James Cook saw the mountains, named Glass House



体会一下动作的发出者是谁吧
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-17 17:40:41 | 只看该作者
现在分词不是用来修饰就近词的
就拿你前面例子中的protecting好了。protecting不是修饰equipment或items的,而是表述shields的功能。
现在分词还可以用来做动作伴随,等等

过去分词修饰就近词做后置定语
举个例子,followed原来都是写成which is followed,但是省略写成followed修饰限制前面的名词

这样你就很好明白为什么OG说naming的发出者应该是JC,而原句主语为mountains,不能用naming
-- by 会员 tibet (2010/1/17 16:29:07)



这位G友,请仔细看og解释,og上明明白白告诉我们protecting  creates a modifying phrase that clearly explains the purpose of the items of  military equipment,和你说得shields没有关系。

这道题目初看很简单,我第一次做,首先就把c排除了,正确答案也非常容易得到,可是随着复习的深入,才有了以上疑惑
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-17 17:42:28 | 只看该作者
Og解释as the object of a preposition and not the subject of the clause, James Cook does not work as the noun that the verbal phase beginning with naming can describe.
现在的问题是,og的解释到底什么意思
10#
发表于 2010-1-17 18:01:18 | 只看该作者
呵呵,还是我
protecting引导的现在分词短语清楚地表达了items的目的,shields是protecting的形式主语,不矛盾啊
James Cook应作为naming的形式主语,但错误选项里面是作为介词by的宾语,而不是主句主语,mountain不能是naming的主语。
OG的解释是说,如果是subject of the clause,那么James Cook就work了。可惜不是。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-18 20:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部