ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1998|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教:FeiFei-82

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-6 10:11:00 | 只看该作者

求教:FeiFei-82

82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.






Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion above to be properly drawn?






A.      Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth cannot furnish definitive proof.



B.      The whole truth cannot be known.



C.      It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense.



D.      It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence if there isadditional evidence establishing the truth about the scene photographed.



E、If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove definitively the truth about it


请问:A、和D选项如何翻译?为什么选A不选D?


沙发
发表于 2004-8-6 12:45:00 | 只看该作者

A:任何被认为错误的,并不能表达全部事实的东西都不能提供确凿的证据。

D:如果有其他证据来证明照片的真实性,就有可能用照片来做确凿的证据。

知道意思后,在运用取非原则,你会看出为什么选A不选D的。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 20:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部